The Herald-Sun (and most of the News Ltd properties) vastly improved their web site a week or two ago. But they’re obviously having a few issues this morning…
Ah, I see they’ve fixed it already.
The Herald-Sun (and most of the News Ltd properties) vastly improved their web site a week or two ago. But they’re obviously having a few issues this morning…
Ah, I see they’ve fixed it already.
Don’t be an eBay buyer, or you could turn into this crazy eBay woman. Be a seller. Perhaps you’re going to make a killing on PS3s. Or you’ve just cornered the world market in a particular Lego set. Just don’t pick some dud product. While you’re not going to become an eBay millionare, often the question is “What’s the trick to make the most money”?
Everyone with an opinion disagrees.
Shipping
Research shows that people are relatively insensitive to shipping costs, even though honour and the eBay rules say you can’t charge much beyond what it actually costs to ship. But perhaps the research was flawed, it only sampled 80 purchases.
Duration
The PS3 guy reckons 3 day auctions are the way to go. Roth reckons ten day ones are best, because they cover two weekends. Smith says 10 day auctions suck, but gives no reason.
Finish time
Sunday evening might work well, and in my sample of one it worked great, but:
Sunday evening may well be a peak time for ebay but bear in mind that there will be both an increase in buyers AND of auctions/competition so it’s not clear it’s the best time to end an auction. I’ve found Sunday, Monday, Thursday evenings to be good.
People are home on the weekends. Are they home, bored? I guess you want your auction to finish at such a time that when people see it, they’re willing to bid on it.
Body copy
Sean Blanda at College v2 says ‘don’t waste time on narrative‘. J.D. Roth thinks just the opposite. My anecdotal evidence says that amusing, engaging and informative copy makes for higher realised prices; the time investment in this, however, can be a killer. So you’d want to be selling multiples of whatever it is. Perhaps because I included a story of the item’s provenance it helped.
Starting price
Low starting bids are universally suggested, but often the following caveat is normally ignored:
It’s also not true that a 0.99 starting price is always the best policy. This is only true if your item has a lot of demand. Many times if there are only a few buyers interested and you list the item at near retail you will eventually get a buyer willing to pay that price – you may need to relist a few times. If you had starting it at 0.99 it may be that only one buyer happens to be interested at the time of the auction.
Moreover, if you have more than one item that will generally have few buyers and you list at 0.99 and it sells at that price, you’ve then set a precedence. People who search for completed listings will now perceive the item to be worth 0.99 – not good.
Myself, I’m going to use a buy-it-now price. I’m in no rush to sell, and really want the super premium I can capture.
Pictures
Everyone says put in a picture, but here’s a money-saving tip:
You can embed lots of pictures in your html rather than pay ebay to upload them – ebay gives one free & charges for the rest. It takes a little bit to learn this, but is NOT difficult.
Geeks aren’t afraid of HTML. And we love optimizing things, such as cost.
Feeback
Early or late? I think you’ve done unilateral disarmament if you’ve left feedback before the buyer has. But some people think you ought to leave feedback as soon as you’ve got the money. But a buyer can screw you over in so many ways after giving you the money. Bad move.
Unclear
I don’t know what the right Finish Time is. Any suggestions, with reasoning or, better yet, evidence?
Here’s the algorithm for checksumming a credit card number, plus information on what all the fields are.
But you can checksum the numbers all you like, if the signature doesn’t match the transaction never happened.
Lately I’ve been thinking about the concept of business cards.
Business cards are a token for re-establishing communications after an intial meeting. You meet someone, give them your card, and they later use that card to get in contact with you. But for them to remember who the token was from, it must match to a context they have constructed – so you need to include information on the card to aid that recall.
The information I consider necessary for contextual reconstruction is your name, photo, role and organisation. A hint at what the organisation does also helps. Most business cards don’t include a photo, I imagine because doing so would make you look like a prat; many people have difficulty recalling someone just from their name, but a photo gives instant recall. A work-around for the prat issue may be a witty comment on the card like “Not photogenic, but a Software Engineer nonetheless”. The card should have blank space for writing in additional context information. Garrett Dimon thinks that job titles just don’t work in small companies, so includes a micro-CV instead. I think you’ve got to leave space for written notes, so user-generated context information can be stored. On Garrett’s cards, I’d do the CV in gray so it can be treated like background text and scrawled over. To scrawl on a card, having process colour and the surface that produces doesn’t cut it. Go with spot colour on a matt card, so that pencils, felt-tip pens or whatever will work.
As for what contact information should be included, I think that voice, web and email addresses are mandatory, but there’s no need for fax numbers or street addresses – they can voice/email you and ask.
Is it important to make business cards that people keep? I think the way you can ensure someone keeping your card is to make it useful at what it is – a token. If you demand a memorable or keepable card, you could make a business card that can also be used for estimating distances. Or you could put an unobtrusive puzzle on there, like a Soduku. Or make the card dual use – like a business card / lock picking tool set. The internet has killed Compact Disc Business cards, because presenting that much data is easy over the internet (and people are a hesitant to put a rectangular CD into their drive. Unless it was something useful, like Damn Small Linux) – another useful card could have holes cut out to enable UML diagramming with a metal business card (stainless steel, US$1.80 each); or perhaps frosted plastic. On the creative side, you could do a PCB business card, or just give them a puppy. But these are all gimmicks; if gimmicks do it for you – or your customers – great. But don’t break the rules. Wallets are designed to hold business cards, so if yours doesn’t fit it’s going to have to be ultra-compelling to keep.
Robert Scoble thinks a good business card starts a conversation, and he might be right – if you treat business cards as a way of generating business leads. And the gimmick cards would certainly do that. But would you really contact someone based on a cool business card? Surely you should have started the conversation before you swap cards. He also says that fun job titles are so last century, but if there’s originality, I disagree. Director of Doughnut Freshness, indeed. But plain and boring might not be a problem, if you’re so interesting people want your card regardless.
Guys, a hint: don’t confuse calling cards and business cards. Trying to pick up chicks with a business card just doesn’t fly. Calling cards perhaps should be more interesting, or show more personality, than business cards. In fact they are more a marketting device than a contact token. Step 4 at Great FX’s ‘Design Business Cards in Adobe Photoshop’ article includes a bunch of useful links for designing a business card.
There are International / cultural considerations – the Japanese keep getting mentioned as being different. Like, only girls have rounded corners on their cards, and the Japanese hand cards over upon meeting. And I believe that the Japanese might freak out if you wrote all over their business card. But I don’t know much about this area.
What’s the best business card you’ve ever seen? The worst?
Joel Spolsky is outraged over an IT security advert with the slogan “To catch a geek, you have to think like a geek”, featuring a picture of a man in illfitting trousers, red socks and plain black shoes:
What is this, high school? With the bullies who fail all their classes have such an inferiority complex they have to make fun of the geeks?
You know, I’m a professional geek. And I’ve worked with a lot of other professional geeks. Dozens. Maybe even hundreds.
Most of them are smart, and many of them brilliant. The vast majority are well-dressed. Only a tiny minority have fitted into the geek stereotype of unfashionable nerdy incomprehensible uncommunicative brainiacs.
Most of them a very well dressed, friendly, outgoing people. Some (gasp) are even women.
Okay, so it’s only advertising. But it’s obviously got a few noses out-of-joint. And from Joel’s reaction, some of those noses are decision-maker noses.
Too busy to post much. Major deployment this weekend. Though I’m not working as hard as some of the other guys; thankfully (and due in no minor part to our excellent tester) I think most of our stuff is under control.
I’m working on a project that uses web services code written in .Net (‘cos it’s heaps easier that way) but calls legacy code written in VB6. And vice versa.
(Wow, I never thought I’d be referring to VB6 code as legacy, but there you go. None of your smart comments, any VB-haters out there.)
Here’s what I’ve discovered about making it work. Continue reading
(Work-safe)
You might have seen human Space Invaders:
Here’s a rather more chaotic human Pacman:
Compare this agency ad, which turns up in a “linux C++” search, to this homegrown ad, which turns up in a “linux C++” search.
I encourage everyone to apply for the first job. They clearly want everyone to do so. I certainly did. You’d think that agencies, with their unabashed love of keyword searching would know better… perhaps they’re fully aware of what they’re doing. I love their fourteen key areas of specialization. The second job, well, read the instructions. It’s a nice place, with a good coffee machine. And people too. And management that’s able to pull itself back from the brink of cluelessness without being yelled at. Mind you, the last few paragraphs used to read:
Now, we won’t chuck your application away if you don’t hit all these points. But if you clearly don’t match the job at all you will get an abusive email. We will be drawing our conclusions from the application you send (hint, hint). Comparisons will be drawn between yourself and a small rodent.
We’re located on St Kilda Rd near the Domain Interchange. Public transport is pretty good here. Oh, we’ve got a darn good coffee machine, if that floats your boat.
Note: Do not send us an application if you are clueless. You’re wasting our precious time, and you will get an abusive email in response.
Anyone know what this is the barcode for? And why anyone would collect barcodes? What are they going to do with them? What could anybody do with them?
Professional archivists agonise about how digital archives should be stored, but it’s important for those of us further down the food chain consider it too. Many people are simply burning their most prized data onto CD or DVD, and shoving the discs into the bookshelf. But given known doubts about the lifespan of burnt discs, how will you feel if they reach for them in 5 or 10 years and find them unreadable? (Just like I recently found many of my old BBC Micro disks unreadable.)
Pressed discs seem to be no problem. I’ve got CDs that are close to 20 years old that are still going strong. But recent warnings have highlighted that burnt CDs might only last a few years (even taking great care in handling and storage).
It’s been suggested that magnetic tape is the way to go in the longer term, with a view to periodically migrating to newer technologies as they come along. I’m still not sure I want to invest in a tape drive…
The other issue is formats. What format should be used to ensure that when you or your descendants poke around in your files, they’ll be readable? It’s not just a matter of choosing formats that are ubiquitous now, but also those that will be common into the future.
Think back 20 years. What formats were popular in 1986 that are still around now?
I think, for example, that of all the formats, JPEG and PNG (for pictures), MPEG-1 or 2 (movies), and MP3 (sounds) are perhaps the formats that have such open, widespread support that they’re likely to still be readable in 20 or 30 years’ time.
For text documents? What’s practical probably depends on your source files. Obviously TXT is totally human-readable, but lacking formatting. HTML (with support from JPEG and PNG) is probably the most obvious choice for many documents, as long as you don’t try and do anything too clever with it. RTF also has widespread support via open-source products such as OpenOffice, Mac OSX TextEdit and while it’s owned by Microsoft, is arguably as human-readable as HTML, and arguably an easier conversion for many existing documents such as those in Word format (though I’m not sure it supports all of Word’s latest features).
For other more specialised file formats, I suppose it depends what is the easiest format to keep them in… Definitely more thought required.
(Of course if there’s any doubt, printing on paper is the ultimate in future-proof technology!)
Want to see some HTML Form stupidity? Go to http://www.toysrus.com.au/site/signUp.htm and you get:
Radio buttons – users know what to expect from them. You can pick only one option. Not these puppies. These happen to be round checkboxes – that you can only turn on. You can’t turn them off! Oh, sure, there’s a “reset” button down the bottom of the form, but can you recall the last time you pressed the “reset” button on a form? I don’t think, in my many many years using the ‘net, I ever have. Not once. I have “reset button blindness”, and I imagine a bunch of others do too.
To top this off, because the site is mainly Flash, figuring out what the address of the page took a while. In the end I had to bookmark it to find it.
I guess that’s what happens when you get schoolchildren to build your website.