<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Geek Rant dot org</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.geekrant.org/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.geekrant.org</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 07:30:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Old shapes in Visio</title>
		<link>http://www.geekrant.org/2012/01/20/old-shapes-in-visio/</link>
		<comments>http://www.geekrant.org/2012/01/20/old-shapes-in-visio/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 07:30:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>daniel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Visio]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekrant.org/?p=2111</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I know I&#8217;m using an old (2003) version of Visio, but seriously&#8230; paper tape? (I suppose these days &#8220;cards&#8221; could refer to some kind of portable storage, though I bet it really means punch cards.)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know I&#8217;m using an old (2003) version of Visio, but seriously&#8230; paper tape?</p>
<p><img src="/files/2012/visio.png" width="420" height="352" alt="Visio shapes" /></p>
<p>(I suppose these days &#8220;cards&#8221; could refer to some kind of portable storage, though I bet it really means punch cards.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.geekrant.org/2012/01/20/old-shapes-in-visio/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wikipedia is now blacked out</title>
		<link>http://www.geekrant.org/2012/01/18/wikipedia-blacked-out/</link>
		<comments>http://www.geekrant.org/2012/01/18/wikipedia-blacked-out/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 05:11:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>daniel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekrant.org/?p=2108</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wikipedia is now blacked-out for 24 hours. Note that at the time of writing, clicking the &#8220;Learn more&#8221; link takes you to a page that momentarily has more information, but then itself gets blacked-out. D&#8217;oh. I&#8217;m guessing they&#8217;ll fix that soon. I&#8217;m guessing the Google Cache will get a good workout in the next 24 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wikipedia is now blacked-out for 24 hours.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/danielbowen/6718480881/" title="Wikipedia blacked-out by Daniel Bowen, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7152/6718480881_db80acdc7a_z.jpg" width="640" height="394" alt="Wikipedia blacked-out"/></a></p>
<p>Note that at the time of writing, clicking the &#8220;Learn more&#8221; link takes you to a page that momentarily has more information, but then itself gets blacked-out. D&#8217;oh. I&#8217;m guessing they&#8217;ll fix that soon.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m guessing the Google Cache will get a good workout in the next 24 hours. To use it, search Google as normal; look for the Wikipedia link, and click the right button [1] to make the cache preview appear, then click the &#8220;Cached&#8221; link [2] to look at it in full size.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/danielbowen/6718496887/" title="Using the Google Cache to read Wikipedia by Daniel Bowen, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7024/6718496887_34f1d5f39b_z.jpg" width="640" height="401" alt="Using the Google Cache to read Wikipedia"/></a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-16590585">More about the SOPA protest</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.geekrant.org/2012/01/18/wikipedia-blacked-out/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Top spams</title>
		<link>http://www.geekrant.org/2012/01/16/top-spams/</link>
		<comments>http://www.geekrant.org/2012/01/16/top-spams/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 09:06:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>daniel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Spam]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekrant.org/?p=2103</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The work email server spam filter does not simply reject everything suspicious &#8211; this would risk us losing legitimate emails, something made worse by some companies choosing to send invoices and remittances as PDF attachments with no accompanying text whatsoever, something the mail server considers dodgy. So (until I work out a better, foolproof automated [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The work email server spam filter does not simply reject everything suspicious &#8211; this would risk us losing legitimate emails, something made worse by some companies choosing to send invoices and remittances as PDF attachments with no accompanying text whatsoever, something the mail server considers dodgy.</p>
<p>So (until I work out a better, foolproof automated process, or take the time to properly tweak the spam settings on the server) I manually look through some of the doubtful messages to pluck out those that are not actually spam.</p>
<p>The most common types of spam messages caught seem to be&#8230;</p>
<p>5. Your credit card is blocked (enter all your details into our dodgy web site)&#8230;</p>
<p>4. Work from home and earn $$$&#8230;</p>
<p>3. Marry a gorgeous Russian girl&#8230;</p>
<p>2. Cheap replica watches (Rolex etc)&#8230;</p>
<p>1. Cheap medicine to help gentlemen with, err, size-related personal problems.</p>
<p>&#8230;though it appears cheap Canadian pharmacies are also gaining in popularity, despite this being for a .com.au address.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.geekrant.org/2012/01/16/top-spams/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Remote server frustration</title>
		<link>http://www.geekrant.org/2011/12/30/remote-server-frustration/</link>
		<comments>http://www.geekrant.org/2011/12/30/remote-server-frustration/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2011 21:41:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>daniel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Web pages]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekrant.org/?p=2100</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I can understand the principle of locking down web browsers on server machines, but there should at least be a straightforward way of overriding it. The other week we were connected to a remote server trying to debug some ASPX code. That&#8217;s remote as in: on another continent, and not using the fastest connection. (It [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can understand the principle of locking down web browsers on server machines, but there should at least be a straightforward way of overriding it.</p>
<p>The other week we were connected to a remote server trying to debug some ASPX code. That&#8217;s remote as in: on another continent, and not using the fastest connection. (It was designed to be fast for a remote population of users, not us.)</p>
<p>A good way to debug the code without switching on debug errors for everybody is to RDP onto the box and browse it from there.</p>
<p>This didn&#8217;t work because, despite Windows 2008 IE ESC (<a href="http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms537180.aspx">Internet Explorer Enhanced Security Configuration</a>) not being enabled, it was blocking cookies, and every option I could find to try and turn it back on was either disabled, or did nothing.</p>
<p>&#8216;Cos you know, browsing localhost (which has your own code on it ferchrissake) is a terrible security risk. Sigh.</p>
<p>In a rush to resolve it, we eventually resorted to downloading and installing Firefox on the machine. (I love Chrome, but its automatic updates and things scare me slightly; probably not good for a server. Some day I&#8217;ll dig around and figure out if it can be turned off. Come to think of it I should make sure FF doesn&#8217;t do the same thing.)</p>
<p>Firefox brought its own problems. Straight after installation, it decided to load up some hideously slow (on this less than ideal link) page with video. No, actually, two pages &#8212; using two tabs &#8212; and despite it proclaiming how fast and responsive it is, wouldn&#8217;t respond. Blargh. Thanks a bundle, Mozilla.</p>
<p>It must have taken a minute or more to come back &#8212; a long frustrating time when you&#8217;re in a hurry.</p>
<p>This solution did, however, work &#8212; we could finally see the debug messages, thank goodness.</p>
<p>Is there an official way of getting IE to behave itself?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.geekrant.org/2011/12/30/remote-server-frustration/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Did Gmail&#8217;s certificate expire?</title>
		<link>http://www.geekrant.org/2011/12/20/gmail-cert/</link>
		<comments>http://www.geekrant.org/2011/12/20/gmail-cert/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2011 10:41:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>daniel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google and Gmail]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekrant.org/?p=2097</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Surely not? Yet I&#8217;m getting this error in Chrome&#8230; IE doesn&#8217;t appear to have this problem. Update 21:43. Ah, it&#8217;s come good. Momentary blip? Wonder how many others got the scary message.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Surely not? Yet I&#8217;m getting this error in Chrome&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/danielbowen/6542901057/" title="Gmail certificate error by Daniel Bowen, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7031/6542901057_08fee1006e_z.jpg" width="640" height="181" alt="Gmail certificate error"/></a></p>
<p>IE doesn&#8217;t appear to have this problem.</p>
<p><strong>Update 21:43</strong>. Ah, it&#8217;s come good. Momentary blip? Wonder how many others got the scary message.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.geekrant.org/2011/12/20/gmail-cert/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

