<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Geek Rant dot org</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.geekrant.org/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.geekrant.org</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 01:13:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Flooding with water</title>
		<link>http://www.geekrant.org/2013/05/23/flooding-with-water/</link>
		<comments>http://www.geekrant.org/2013/05/23/flooding-with-water/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 04:29:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>josh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Future trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Physical]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekrant.org/?p=5039</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So, looking at properties, and a number are down on the floodplain near the local moving body of water, a river/creek.  I wonder to myself if the area is at any risk from floodwater; should I even bother looking at the area? The council, being the government body most connected to the area, ought to know.  It [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, looking at properties, and a number are down on the floodplain near the local moving body of water, a river/creek.  I wonder to myself if the area is at any risk from floodwater; should I even bother looking at the area?</p>
<p>The council, being the government body most connected to the area, ought to know.  It doesn&#8217;t; it can&#8217;t tell me except to tell me if a specific property has a flood-overlay, which says that modelling has determined that it is at risk of a 1 in 100 year flood.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><i><strong>What is the 1 in 100 year flood event?</strong></i></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><em>The 1 in 100 year flood event is the storm that happens on</em><br />
<em> average once every one hundred years (or a 1% chance of</em><br />
<em> occurring in any given year).</em></p>
<p>Now, that means in any given year there&#8217;s a 99% chance you&#8217;re not going to get flooded.  In 100 years, that means a 0.99<sup>100</sup> or a 36.6% chance of not getting flooded. A 2/3 chance of having water washing through your home at some point there.  Basically, that&#8217;s a guarantee that in the next century your home will be damper than normal &#8211; because the 1 in 100 year events are calculated off historic data, not forward climate models.  And the forward models say that things are only going to get more extreme; have you noticed how 1 in 100 year events seem to happen to the same place every decade or so?</p>
<p>In fact, pretty much anyone you talk to &#8211; water utilities for example &#8211; will only talk about 1 in 100 events. Vital government infrastructure (stuff that has to keep operating the event of a flood disaster, like hospitals and my home) has to be above the 1 in 500 line. From what I&#8217;m told, they calculate this on a site-by-site basis rather than having a map (they&#8217;re not building a bunch of new hospitals, so it&#8217;s easier that way).  Sites aren&#8217;t rated as being 1 in 110 year, you&#8217;re either in the 100 year box or not rated at all.</p>
<p>The gist of what I was able to read into the subtext of the hints being passed in my conversation with a town planner specializing in flooding was: <em>Floodplains get flooded, even in cities, even if there&#8217;s a wetlands further upriver that could absorb a sudden influx of water, even if the sides of the creek are quite steep and the channel is surprisingly broad, and even if there are barricades; If you don&#8217;t like that, don&#8217;t live there.</em></p>
<p>So I won&#8217;t.  It makes searching for a home so much easier, even if the homes out of the floodplain are more expensive and built on those annoyingly sloped hill things.</p>
<p>Actually, <a href="https://www.google.com.au/search?q=elizabeth+street+flood&amp;tbm=isch">this reminds me</a> of the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elizabeth_Street,_Melbourne#Floods">1972 Elizabeth St Floods</a> my Mum told me about getting caught in. I would never have guessed a major street in our CBD could turn into a river &#8211; and then it happened again in 2010.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.geekrant.org/2013/05/23/flooding-with-water/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sony Vegas 10: Out of memory when rendering</title>
		<link>http://www.geekrant.org/2013/04/25/vegas-render-out-of-memory/</link>
		<comments>http://www.geekrant.org/2013/04/25/vegas-render-out-of-memory/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2013 23:29:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>daniel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Applications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekrant.org/?p=4821</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We were having issues rendering a reasonably complex but fairly short video using Sony Vegas 10 (32-bit) on a 64-bit machine (Win7 x64) with plenty of RAM and disk space free. After a few seconds each time, the rendering would stop dead with an Out Of Memory error. I looked around on Google, where various [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We were having issues rendering a reasonably complex but fairly short video using Sony Vegas 10 (32-bit) on a 64-bit machine (Win7 x64) with plenty of RAM and disk space free. After a few seconds each time, the rendering would stop dead with an Out Of Memory error.</p>
<p>I looked around on Google, where various discussion forums came to different conclusions about a fix (including changing the rendering thread and RAM options within Vegas) &#8212; and a 4-minute YouTube video claiming also to fix it &#8212; honestly, who has the time to watch something like that? &#8212; <em>just give me the solution in words I can quickly scan and replicate</em>.</p>
<p>I eventually <a href="http://www.dvxuser.com/V6/showthread.php?242525-Vegas-Movie-Studio-HD-plat-10-Low-memory-error-when-rendering-with-FIX">found this</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>I finally found the solution to Vegas giving me memory errors using CFF Explorer&#8230; This is what I did.</p>
<p>1) Using &#8220;<a href="http://www.ntcore.com/exsuite.php">CFF Explorer</a>&#8221; I open the original &#8220;VegasMovieStudioPE100.exe&#8221; file.</p>
<p>2) Now go to &#8220;NT Header/File Header&#8221; and click &#8220;File Header&#8221;. There you will find a button labeled &#8220;click here&#8221;. Click it. And select the checkbox &#8220;App can handle> 2GB address space&#8221;</p>
<p>3) Now press the &#8220;ok&#8221;&#8216;s and when back on the main menu, click on the disk button and save the modified &#8220;.exe&#8221; file, overwrite the orginal one. (Note in Vista and 7 you must be running CFF Explorer in Administrator Mode).</p>
<p>Suddenly all my low memory errors were history and have been able to render all my movies with no issues.</p></blockquote>
<p>Happily, this worked for us too. Hopefully repeating the fix here will help others find it more quickly. Thank you, &#8220;Lowlypawn&#8221; for posting your solution rather than just posting your problems like many do.</p>
<p>At some stage we&#8217;ll upgrade to a newer (64-bit) video editing package. But it&#8217;s nice to know this one can be cranked up to keep going for a bit longer.</p>
<p>It makes me wonder why (a) Sony hasn&#8217;t issued their own information about this, and (b) something as incredibly useful as <a href="http://www.ntcore.com/exsuite.php">CFF Explorer</a> isn&#8217;t built into Windows.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.dvxuser.com/V6/showthread.php?242525-Vegas-Movie-Studio-HD-plat-10-Low-memory-error-when-rendering-with-FIX">Click through to read the full post</a>, which includes feedback from Sony from when he contacted them about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.geekrant.org/2013/04/25/vegas-render-out-of-memory/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Reader still promoted on its logon page</title>
		<link>http://www.geekrant.org/2013/04/16/greader-promo/</link>
		<comments>http://www.geekrant.org/2013/04/16/greader-promo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Apr 2013 21:25:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>daniel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google and Gmail]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekrant.org/?p=4610</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nice to know they still promote Google Reader on its logon page, despite it shutting down in a few months. You can even still take the tour.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice to know they still promote Google Reader on its logon page, despite it <a href="http://googlereader.blogspot.com.au/2013/03/powering-down-google-reader.html">shutting down in a few months</a>.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/danielbowen/8651165799/" title="Google Reader promo by Daniel Bowen, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8523/8651165799_74e94f07a8_z.jpg" width="640" height="571" alt="Google Reader promo" /></a></p>
<p>You can even still <a href="http://support.google.com/reader/answer/113517?hl=en">take the tour</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.geekrant.org/2013/04/16/greader-promo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Subtitling now in the Suez</title>
		<link>http://www.geekrant.org/2013/04/11/subtitling-now-in-the-suez/</link>
		<comments>http://www.geekrant.org/2013/04/11/subtitling-now-in-the-suez/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2013 12:34:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>josh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekrant.org/?p=4483</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I imagine that Jacqui Mapoon from CSI (Captioning and Subtitling Australia&#8230; or International) is someone who helps them out very occasionally, judging by the quality of her work on The Doctor Blake Mysteries: Season 1, Episode 9 &#8220;All That Glitters&#8221; -  atrocious work.  The gaff that stood out most was the transcription of sewers, but there were so many [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I imagine that Jacqui Mapoon from <a href="http://www.captioningandsubtitling.com.au/">CSI</a> (Captioning and Subtitling Australia&#8230; or International) is someone who helps them out very occasionally, judging by the quality of her work on <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt2658752/">The Doctor Blake Mysteries: Season 1, Episode 9 &#8220;All That Glitters&#8221;</a> -  atrocious work.  The gaff that stood out most was the transcription of <a title="Suez Canal - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suez_CanalShare">sewers</a>, but there were so many problems.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t these subtitling services get given the script?  There&#8217;s a job listed in the credits as &#8220;Post production scripts&#8221;, surely they&#8217;re able to hand the script over electronically, and it&#8217;s just a matter of timing, pagination and confirmation &#8211; no transcription, no transcription errors?  I doubt <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0701446/">Tim Pye</a> &#8211; the writer of the episode &#8211; would have got that wrong, nor made the other homophonic errors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.geekrant.org/2013/04/11/subtitling-now-in-the-suez/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How much memory should you have in your PC? How about 8Mb? #BackToThe90s</title>
		<link>http://www.geekrant.org/2013/03/31/how-much-memory/</link>
		<comments>http://www.geekrant.org/2013/03/31/how-much-memory/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Mar 2013 07:33:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>daniel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekrant.org/?p=3989</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Charles Wright, the IT whiz who writes regularly in The Age Green Guide, and has a persistent habit of referring to himself in the plural, reckons in his latest column that you should have eight megabytes in your PC, but soon it&#8217;ll be practical to have up to sixteen megabytes. This quarter the price of [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Charles Wright, the IT whiz who writes regularly in The Age Green Guide, and has a persistent habit of referring to himself in the plural, <a href="http://www.theage.com.au/digital-life/computers/hitch-up-the-workhorse-20130327-2gsuw.html">reckons in his latest column</a> that you should have eight <strong>megabytes</strong> in your PC, but soon it&#8217;ll be practical to have up to sixteen megabytes.</p>
<blockquote><p>This quarter the price of RAM has jumped about 60 per cent as manufacturers shift the emphasis to production of mobile memory, squeezing supply of PC memory. The 8MB of Kingston RAM that we recommend is now $60, compared with $38 in December.<br />
&#8230;<br />
It&#8217;s possible to see the future of desktop computing contained in a diminutive box into which the customer can stuff as much as 16MB of RAM and a fast mSATA SSD drive, at prices ranging from $500 to $700.</p>
<p>&#8211; <a href="http://www.theage.com.au/digital-life/computers/hitch-up-the-workhorse-20130327-2gsuw.html">The Age, 28/3/2013</a></p></blockquote>
<p>Wow, don&#8217;t go overboard on the RAM there Charles.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/danielbowen/8604641687/" title="Charles Wright's column in The Age, 28/3/2013 by Daniel Bowen, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8254/8604641687_cd31ec97d6_z.jpg" width="640" height="154" alt="Charles Wright's column in The Age, 28/3/2013"/></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.geekrant.org/2013/03/31/how-much-memory/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
