<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Geek Rant dot org &#187; OS X</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.geekrant.org/category/platforms/mac/os-x/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.geekrant.org</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 10:44:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Getting used to the Mac</title>
		<link>http://www.geekrant.org/2009/11/02/getting-used-to-the-mac/</link>
		<comments>http://www.geekrant.org/2009/11/02/getting-used-to-the-mac/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 00:53:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>daniel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[OS X]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekrant.org/?p=1425</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I usually use Windows, but I&#8217;ve been using Mac OSX a little bit, on a new iMac in the office of an organisation I do some work for. It&#8217;s nice, lovely design, though I think it&#8217;s pretty funny that it&#8217;s so damn streamlined that the On/Off button is hidden away at the back, so consequently [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I usually use Windows, but I&#8217;ve been using Mac OSX a little bit, on a new iMac in the office of an organisation I do some work for. It&#8217;s nice, lovely design, though I think it&#8217;s pretty funny that it&#8217;s so damn streamlined that the On/Off button is hidden away at the back, so consequently there&#8217;s a PostIt note on the front of it to help people find it.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/danielbowen/4065896491/" title="The Mac by Daniel Bowen, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3531/4065896491_f60b6a0a6d.jpg" width="500" height="383" alt="The Mac" /></a></p>
<p>I&#8217;ve got used to having to go to the menu to properly shut a program. I&#8217;m not really clear on why clicking the red dot on the window doesn&#8217;t do it. But that&#8217;s okay &#8212; another PostIt note reminds us Windows people of that.</p>
<p>So far there are two main things I can&#8217;t get used to on the Mac (apart from the lack of tactile response from the keyboard and the feel of the mouse):</p>
<p>Command-Tab switches applications, but not windows. I can&#8217;t figure out how to get around the various open windows of an application without using the Window menu, which is cumbersome.</p>
<p>Differences with navigation around a document, at least how it appears to me so far&#8230; maybe someone knows better.</p>
<table border="1">
<tr>
<th />
<th>PC</th>
<th>Mac</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Go to start or end of document</td>
<td>Ctrl-Home or Ctrl-End</td>
<td>Home or End</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Go to start or end of line</td>
<td>Home or End</td>
<td>Command Left or Right</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Go up/down a page</td>
<td>Page Up or Page Down</td>
<td>Page Up or Page Down</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Go forward or back a word</td>
<td>Ctrl-Right or Ctrl-Left</td>
<td>Option-Right or Option-Left</td>
</tr>
</table>
<p>But the thing that really keeps catching me out is that Home/End/PgUp and PgDown move you around, but don&#8217;t move the cursor. So you think you&#8217;re at the end of the document, but you start typing and it jumps to back where you were. At least, that&#8217;s what it does in Apple Mail. Very irritating; seems you have to click at the end to tell it you want to start typing at the end.</p>
<p>Is there a better/quicker/easier way?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.geekrant.org/2009/11/02/getting-used-to-the-mac/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Snow Leopard &#8211; Intel only</title>
		<link>http://www.geekrant.org/2009/08/28/snow-leopard-intel-only/</link>
		<comments>http://www.geekrant.org/2009/08/28/snow-leopard-intel-only/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 07:18:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>daniel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OS X]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MacOS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PowerPC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekrant.org/?p=1395</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It had to happen, right? Mac OS Snow Leopard is out today. It&#8217;s the first version which doesn&#8217;t run on PowerPC Macs. &#8220;Snow Leopard is an upgrade for Leopard users and requires a Mac with an Intel processor.&#8221; &#8212; Apple Store I suppose it&#8217;s been about three years since Apple stopped selling PowerPCs. I wonder [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It had to happen, right? Mac OS Snow Leopard is out today. It&#8217;s the first version which doesn&#8217;t run on PowerPC Macs.</p>
<p>&#8220;Snow Leopard is an upgrade for Leopard users and requires a Mac with an Intel processor.&#8221; &#8212; <a href="http://store.apple.com/au/product/MAC_OS_X_SNGL">Apple Store</a></p>
<p>I suppose it&#8217;s been about three years since Apple stopped selling PowerPCs. I wonder how many 3rd party software vendors are also abandoning them. I know my sister has a PowerPC Mac laptop from circa 2004, but I wonder how many others are still out there in regular use. Perhaps the more significant issue will be how long <a href="http://support.apple.com/downloads/Security_Update_2009_004__Tiger_PPC_">patches</a> for newly discovered vulnerabilities will be supplied.</p>
<p>Perhaps it&#8217;s no biggie, but I&#8217;m just imagining the fuss that would be made if Microsoft made a new operating system that didn&#8217;t work with four-year-old PCs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.geekrant.org/2009/08/28/snow-leopard-intel-only/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Merry Christmas from Apple</title>
		<link>http://www.geekrant.org/2007/12/26/ipod-compatibility/</link>
		<comments>http://www.geekrant.org/2007/12/26/ipod-compatibility/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Dec 2007 21:30:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>daniel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[iPod]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OS X]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekrant.org/2007/12/26/ipod-compatibility/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My sister is fuming because she got an iPod Nano for Christmas, and apparently it won&#8217;t work with her 3 year old PowerPC MacBook, which runs MacOSX 10.3. Sure enough, the Nano specs say it needs 10.4.8 or higher. She&#8217;s got no real interest in paying and installing for an OS upgrade to get around [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My sister is fuming because she got an iPod Nano for Christmas, and apparently it won&#8217;t work with her 3 year old PowerPC MacBook, which runs MacOSX 10.3. Sure enough, the <a href="http://www.apple.com/au/ipodnano/specs.html">Nano specs</a> say it needs 10.4.8 or higher. She&#8217;s got no real interest in paying and installing for an OS upgrade to get around the problem, so she&#8217;ll ask a friend to load her iPod for her.</p>
<p>Basically it means that Apple is saying you can&#8217;t have a new iPod if you run a version of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mac_OS_X_v10.4">OSX from before <strong>April 2005</strong></a> (with the appropriate free updates).</p>
<p>Whereas it does run happily on Windows XP (SP2) or Windows Vista. So you need to have a version of Windows from no earlier than <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_xp">before <strong>October 2001</strong></a> (with the appropriate free updates).</p>
<p>How <em>does</em> Apple get away with treating its customers like that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.geekrant.org/2007/12/26/ipod-compatibility/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No more security through obscurity</title>
		<link>http://www.geekrant.org/2006/05/08/no-more-security-through-obscurity/</link>
		<comments>http://www.geekrant.org/2006/05/08/no-more-security-through-obscurity/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 May 2006 12:53:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>daniel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mozilla]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OS X]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekrant.org/?p=632</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Feel safe using Firefox and/or Mac OS X? Don&#8217;t. This article discusses recent research showing both are subject to a number of vulnerabilities. Not as many as poor ol&#8217; Windows users using IE, but still enough that it&#8217;s wise to be wary. Not to mention the issues in the various media players.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Feel safe using Firefox and/or Mac OS X? Don&#8217;t. <a href="http://www.macworld.com/news/2006/05/01/sans/index.php">This article</a> discusses recent research showing both are subject to a number of vulnerabilities. Not as many as poor ol&#8217; Windows users using IE, but still enough that it&#8217;s wise to be wary.</p>
<p>Not to mention the issues in the various media players.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.geekrant.org/2006/05/08/no-more-security-through-obscurity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More Apple stuff</title>
		<link>http://www.geekrant.org/2005/09/26/more-apple-stuff/</link>
		<comments>http://www.geekrant.org/2005/09/26/more-apple-stuff/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2005 08:15:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>daniel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[iPod]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OS X]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekrant.org/2005/09/26/more-apple-stuff/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Blogger Russell Beattie stirs up a hornet&#8217;s nest by declaring he&#8217;s thinking of switching back from Mac to Windows. Reports are coming in that the new very groovy iPod Nano&#8217;s screen scratches rather too easily, so bad in some cases that the images get distorted. Hot on the heels of the flawed (badly, for some [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Blogger Russell Beattie stirs up a hornet&#8217;s nest by <a href="http://www.russellbeattie.com/notebook/1008631.html">declaring he&#8217;s thinking of switching back from Mac to Windows</a>.</p>
<p>Reports are coming in that the new very groovy iPod Nano&#8217;s screen <a href="http://news.com.com/Problems+surfacing+with+iPod+Nano+screen/2100-1041_3-5880307.html?part=rss&#038;tag=5880307&#038;subj=news">scratches rather too easily</a>, so bad in some cases that the images get distorted.</p>
<p>Hot on the heels of the flawed (badly, for some people) iTunes 5.0, Apple has <a href="http://www.apple.com/itunes/download/">released iTunes 5.0.1</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.geekrant.org/2005/09/26/more-apple-stuff/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

