<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Geek Rant dot org &#187; IE</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.geekrant.org/category/internet/ie/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.geekrant.org</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 10:44:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Google Apps to support last two browser releases</title>
		<link>http://www.geekrant.org/2011/06/05/google-browser-support/</link>
		<comments>http://www.geekrant.org/2011/06/05/google-browser-support/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jun 2011 10:38:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>daniel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google and Gmail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IE]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekrant.org/?p=1996</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Interesting: Google Apps has stated they will support the last major version, and the second-last of web browsers. As of August 1st, we will discontinue support for the following browsers and their predecessors: Firefox 3.5, Internet Explorer 7, and Safari 3. I suppose IE6 was around for so long that it&#8217;s easy to think of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting: <a href="http://gmailblog.blogspot.com/2011/06/our-plans-to-support-modern-browsers.html">Google Apps has stated they will support the last major version, and the second-last of web browsers</a>.</p>
<p><em>As of August 1st, we will discontinue support for the following browsers and their predecessors: Firefox 3.5, Internet Explorer 7, and Safari 3.</em></p>
<p>I suppose IE6 was around for so long that it&#8217;s easy to think of IE7 as being &#8220;new&#8221;. But in fact it&#8217;s <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_Explorer_7">five years old this year</a> (official release October 2006), and was officially superseded two years ago.</p>
<p>Hopefully all those corporates who dragged their heels on IE6 can move a little faster off IE7.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.geekrant.org/2011/06/05/google-browser-support/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>HTML5test.com</title>
		<link>http://www.geekrant.org/2010/04/14/html5test-com/</link>
		<comments>http://www.geekrant.org/2010/04/14/html5test-com/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 21:04:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>daniel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google and Gmail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HTML-CSS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mozilla]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[browsers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HTML]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekrant.org/?p=1585</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Less crazy than the Acid Tests is www.html5test.com Here&#8217;s what I get from a few random browsers I have lying around the place: Firefox 3.5.9 scores 100 out of 160. Chrome 4.1 scores 118 out of 160. IE6? 11 out of 160. IE8? Surprisingly, only 19 out of 160. The browser on my Nokia N95 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Less crazy than the Acid Tests is <a href="http://www.html5test.com/">www.html5test.com</a></p>
<p>Here&#8217;s what I get from a few random browsers I have lying around the place:</p>
<p>Firefox 3.5.9 scores 100 out of 160.</p>
<p>Chrome 4.1 scores 118 out of 160.</p>
<p>IE6? 11 out of 160.</p>
<p>IE8? Surprisingly, only 19 out of 160.</p>
<p>The browser on my Nokia N95 phone doesn&#8217;t load the page properly; it just says &#8220;Working&#8230;&#8221; and 0 out of 4 (eg it stalls on the first round of tests).</p>
<p>Interestingly, I also tried IE6 with the <a href="http://code.google.com/chrome/chromeframe/">Google Chrome Frame</a> in it; it scored 137 out of 160, better than Chrome itself. Weird.</p>
<p>Obviously all the browser authors have a way to go to support this if it&#8217;s going to be the bold new standard on the web.</p>
<p>(Found via <a href="http://twitter.com/andrewsayer/status/12018901261">Andrew</a>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.geekrant.org/2010/04/14/html5test-com/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Windows browser speed test</title>
		<link>http://www.geekrant.org/2008/09/28/windows-browser-speed-test/</link>
		<comments>http://www.geekrant.org/2008/09/28/windows-browser-speed-test/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2008 23:39:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>daniel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google and Gmail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mozilla]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opera]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekrant.org/2008/09/28/windows-browser-speed-test/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lifehacker has an updated set of Windows web browser speed test results: Chrome, Safari, Opera, IE and Firefox. Seems Safari and Opera are the fastest, though they also note Firefox uses the least memory.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lifehacker has an updated set of <a href="http://www.lifehacker.com.au/tips/2008/09/27/browser_speed_tests_the_compiled_uptodate_results-2.html">Windows web browser speed test results</a>: Chrome, Safari, Opera, IE and Firefox.</p>
<p>Seems Safari and Opera are the fastest, though they also note Firefox uses the least memory.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.geekrant.org/2008/09/28/windows-browser-speed-test/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Flash crash</title>
		<link>http://www.geekrant.org/2008/08/03/flash-crash/</link>
		<comments>http://www.geekrant.org/2008/08/03/flash-crash/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2008 06:03:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>daniel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[IE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mozilla]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekrant.org/2008/08/03/flash-crash/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is it just me who&#8217;s having stability problems with theage.com.au? Sometimes when I&#8217;m loading pages, it crashes the browser completely. Locks it up. It happens at home, on both my PCs, in both IE7 and Firefox on XP SP2, and appears to be linked to a video player Flash applet displayed on some pages, particularly [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it just me who&#8217;s having stability problems with theage.com.au? Sometimes when I&#8217;m loading pages, it crashes the browser completely. Locks it up. It happens at home, on both my PCs, in both IE7 and Firefox on XP SP2, and appears to be linked to a video player Flash applet displayed on some pages, particularly at night and weekends when they appear not to have other content such as adverts to show.</p>
<p><img src="/files/2008/age-crash.jpg" width="657" height="283" alt="Age crash" /></p>
<p>Oddly it doesn&#8217;t occur at work, but it causes big problems at home. I&#8217;ve updated to the latest Flash plugin and that doesn&#8217;t seem to help. I haven&#8217;t found any other Flash applets that cause the issue.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve put theage.com.au into IE&#8217;s Restricted Sites list. That neatly zaps the use of plugins like Flash.</p>
<p>There appears to be no equivalent method in Firefox. <a href="http://flashblock.mozdev.org/">Flashblock</a> would do the job, but is a little like a sledgehammer to crack a nut. <a href="http://adblockplus.org/en/">AdBlock Plus</a> should do better.</p>
<p>Of course, none of this solves the root cause. I wonder if it&#8217;s just me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.geekrant.org/2008/08/03/flash-crash/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>IE8 about-face</title>
		<link>http://www.geekrant.org/2008/03/04/ie8-about-face/</link>
		<comments>http://www.geekrant.org/2008/03/04/ie8-about-face/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 01:34:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>daniel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[IE]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekrant.org/2008/03/04/ie8-about-face/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Web developers are rejoicing, as IE8 is to be standards-compliant by default. IE Blog. Mary Jo Foley&#8217;s report. By the way, Long Zheng has a preview of the IE8 toolbar. I like the way the domain is highlighted&#8230; I wonder if FF et al will copy that feature and get it out the door before [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Web developers are rejoicing, as IE8 is to be standards-compliant by default.</p>
<p><a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/ie/archive/2008/03/03/microsoft-s-interoperability-principles-and-ie8.aspx">IE Blog</a>.</p>
<p><a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/microsoft/?p=1235">Mary Jo Foley&#8217;s report</a>.</p>
<p>By the way, Long Zheng has a preview of <a href="http://www.istartedsomething.com/20080303/internet-explorer-8-interface-not-fat/">the IE8 toolbar</a>. I like the way the domain is highlighted&#8230; I wonder if FF et al will copy that feature and get it out the door before IE8 is ready for general release?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.geekrant.org/2008/03/04/ie8-about-face/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

