<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Geek Rant dot org &#187; Hosting</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.geekrant.org/category/internet/hosting/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.geekrant.org</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 10:44:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Easy ways to save bandwidth</title>
		<link>http://www.geekrant.org/2007/04/04/easy-ways-to-save-bandwidth/</link>
		<comments>http://www.geekrant.org/2007/04/04/easy-ways-to-save-bandwidth/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2007 09:48:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>daniel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Compression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hosting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wordpress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekrant.org/2007/04/04/easy-ways-to-save-bandwidth/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After reading Jeff Atwood&#8217;s terrific post about saving bandwidth on web sites I&#8217;ve moved the Geekrant RSS feeds over to Feedburner, using Steve Smith&#8217;s mavellous WordPress Feedburner plugin, which works in WP 2.0x and 1.5x. I also turned on HTTP compression, which in WordPress is as easy as clicking a checkbox. It not only saves [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After reading <a href="http://www.codinghorror.com/blog/archives/000807.html">Jeff Atwood&#8217;s terrific post about saving bandwidth on web sites</a> I&#8217;ve moved the Geekrant RSS feeds over to Feedburner, using <a href="http://orderedlist.com/wordpress-plugins/feedburner-plugin/">Steve Smith&#8217;s mavellous WordPress Feedburner plugin</a>, which works in WP 2.0x and 1.5x.</p>
<p>I also turned on HTTP compression, which in WordPress is as easy as clicking a checkbox. It not only saves you bandwidth, but users get your pages served quicker, since the bottleneck is bound to be their bandwidth, not their browser&#8217;s ability to decompress.</p>
<p>We&#8217;ll see how it goes. Bandwidth has been growing recently: January 2.8Gb; February 2.7Gb; March 3.4Gb. It&#8217;s not at ludicrous levels, but if it keeps climbing, I&#8217;ll end up paying more for the hosting. Hopefully this will help bring it back down.</p>
<p><strong>Update 8:40pm.</strong> First thing I notice is that when reading the feed <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/geekrant">from <em>within</em> the Feedburner site</a>, it doesn&#8217;t treat relative paths to images properly. I guess I&#8217;ll have to put absolute paths, &#8216;cos at the moment in the previous post it&#8217;s trying to load http://feeds.feedburner.com/files/2007/mediagate-mg35.jpg instead of http://www.geekrant.org/files/2007/mediagate-mg35.jpg. I wonder how it treats <a href="/2007/04/03/mediagate-mg35-media-player/?phpMyAdmin=2548736ddac4bdbe5239cf8ee610acd1">relative links</a>?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.geekrant.org/2007/04/04/easy-ways-to-save-bandwidth/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>htaccess Generator</title>
		<link>http://www.geekrant.org/2006/05/26/htaccess-generator/</link>
		<comments>http://www.geekrant.org/2006/05/26/htaccess-generator/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 May 2006 05:14:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>josh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hosting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekrant.org/2006/05/26/htaccess-generator/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Daniel would love this htaccess Generator, not that he needs it, what with him being a htaccess-loving-geek and all]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Daniel would love this <a href="http://cooletips.de/htaccess/">htaccess Generator</a>, not that he needs it, what with him being a htaccess-loving-geek and all</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.geekrant.org/2006/05/26/htaccess-generator/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Outages and response times</title>
		<link>http://www.geekrant.org/2006/04/11/outages-and-response-times/</link>
		<comments>http://www.geekrant.org/2006/04/11/outages-and-response-times/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Apr 2006 09:37:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>daniel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hosting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Outages]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekrant.org/?p=586</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cam ponders web hosting SLAs and wonders what&#8217;s reasonable. For his hosting, they guarantee 99.99% uptime, which works out to 52 minutes per year. (His outage was about 9 hours, or about ten years&#8217; worth). Bad stuff happens. We all know that. Even if it&#8217;s the most reliable setup ever. But there&#8217;s some major factors [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://reilly.typepad.com/cameronreilly/2006/04/hosting_sla_wha.html">Cam ponders web hosting SLAs</a> and wonders what&#8217;s reasonable. For his hosting, they guarantee 99.99% uptime, which works out to 52 minutes per year. (His outage was about 9 hours, or about ten years&#8217; worth).</p>
<p>Bad stuff happens. We all know that. Even if it&#8217;s the most reliable setup ever. But there&#8217;s some major factors in determining what&#8217;s acceptable:</p>
<p>Frequency &#8212; If it&#8217;s happening too regularly, then there&#8217;s a reliability problem. They need better hardware, better software, whatever it is, needs to be fixed. Cam reckons it&#8217;s the second time in a few months.</p>
<p>Response &#8212; Obviously, you want a quick response, and a quick (and reliable) solution. There&#8217;s also sorts of monitoring tools out there these days. Typically anything like a full outage should be known about within minutes. A reputable web host will have substitute hardware ready to switch-on and go just as soon as that nice recent backup is restored.</p>
<p>Communications &#8212; Any third party like this has to keep the customer informed. There&#8217;s no excuse for not doing so. SMS alarms, emails, phone calls, whatever. (I <a href="http://www.evision.com.au/2006/02/14/alert-alert/">wrote about alarms</a> recently for my work blog.)</p>
<p>BTW, Cam&#8217;s also <a href="http://reilly.typepad.com/cameronreilly/2006/04/apples_90_day_r.html">having troubles with his iPod</a>&#8230; or more accurately, Apple&#8217;s 90 day warranty on replacement units.</p>
<p>I reckon he&#8217;s jinxed, myself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.geekrant.org/2006/04/11/outages-and-response-times/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Seeing a new server before re-delegation</title>
		<link>http://www.geekrant.org/2005/12/20/hacking-hosts/</link>
		<comments>http://www.geekrant.org/2005/12/20/hacking-hosts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2005 10:17:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>daniel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hosting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wordpress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekrant.org/2005/12/20/seeing-a-new-server-before-re-delegation/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of the weaknesses of WordPress and most other web-configured applications is that unless you want to go SQL or config-file-wrangling, it&#8217;s pretty much only configurable via the web, at least for tweaking, importing posts, setting up most of the options. This is a problem when, for instance, you&#8217;re migrating an existing site onto WP, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the weaknesses of <a href="http://wordpress.org/">WordPress</a> and most other web-configured applications is that unless you want to go SQL or config-file-wrangling, it&#8217;s pretty much only configurable via the web, at least for tweaking, importing posts, setting up most of the options. This is a problem when, for instance, you&#8217;re migrating an existing site onto WP, and it&#8217;s on a new server, as you can&#8217;t get to the wp-admin screens.</p>
<p>The way to do it is to hack your hosts file. Once the new server is running and WP is setup on it, find your hosts file and add an entry to the new server. On Windows, this is the c:\windows\system32\drivers\etc\hosts file.</p>
<p>Chuck in a line that says contains your new server&#8217;s IP address, and the hostname. Something like:</p>
<p>192.168.0.1	www.evision.com.au</p>
<p>(Whoopsie, real-world example with a fake IP. The new evision site is going live Real Soon Now.)</p>
<p>Save, then away you go. You can see the new site and tweak to your heart&#8217;s content, but nobody else will be able to see any of it until you re-delegate.</p>
<p>The catch? It probably won&#8217;t work from behind corporate networks, where your computer uses a proxy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.geekrant.org/2005/12/20/hacking-hosts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hurricane Rita</title>
		<link>http://www.geekrant.org/2005/09/22/hurricane-rita/</link>
		<comments>http://www.geekrant.org/2005/09/22/hurricane-rita/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2005 07:14:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>daniel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hosting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekrant.org/?p=412</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve been notified by my web ISP that Hurricane Rita is approaching Houston. Why does this matter? Because geekrant.org (and a number of other sites I run) are sitting on a server in a data centre in Houston. I&#8217;ve been encouraged to take backups of important content, which I&#8217;ll be doing. It&#8217;s a reminder that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been notified by my web ISP that <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2005/WEATHER/09/22/rita/index.html">Hurricane Rita is approaching Houston</a>. Why does this matter? Because geekrant.org (and a number of other sites I run) are sitting on a server in a data centre in Houston. I&#8217;ve been encouraged to take backups of important content, which I&#8217;ll be doing. It&#8217;s a reminder that <a href="http://www.geekrant.org/2005/08/22/backup-backup-backup/">regular backups</a> are an essential precaution.</p>
<p>If the site goes down in the next day or two, you&#8217;ll know why. Best wishes to those in the affected areas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.geekrant.org/2005/09/22/hurricane-rita/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

