<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Geek Rant dot org &#187; Input devices</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.geekrant.org/category/hardware/input-devices/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.geekrant.org</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 10:44:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Pinnacle TV viewing software</title>
		<link>http://www.geekrant.org/2007/07/12/pinnacle-tv-viewing-software/</link>
		<comments>http://www.geekrant.org/2007/07/12/pinnacle-tv-viewing-software/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2007 13:06:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>daniel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Input devices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekrant.org/2007/07/12/pinnacle-tv-viewing-software/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A followup on the Pinnacle 310i tuner I got last year. It gets some brilliant results when capturing, especially from digital TV transmissions. Playing back a recording on the MG35 media player is a joy to behold (and that&#8217;s off the SD signal&#8230; the HD signal, from a true HD programme, is incredibly nice when [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A followup on the <a href="http://www.geekrant.org/2006/09/04/pinnacle-310i-tv-tuner/">Pinnacle 310i tuner I got last year</a>.</p>
<p><img src="/files/2007/pinnacle-tv-center-pro.jpg" width="300" height="168" alt="Pinnacle TV Center Pro" align="right" />It gets some brilliant results when capturing, especially from digital TV transmissions. Playing back a recording on the <a href="http://www.geekrant.org/2007/04/03/mediagate-mg35-media-player/">MG35 media player</a> is a joy to behold (and that&#8217;s off the SD signal&#8230; the HD signal, from a true HD programme, is incredibly nice when playing back on the PC, though it appears the MG35 can&#8217;t handle that high a data rate very well).</p>
<p>But the software it came with is a steaming pile of crap. When I installed it I <a href="http://www.geekrant.org/2006/09/04/pinnacle-310i-tv-tuner/">noted with caution</a> its use of SQL Server Express Edition and its probable load on the PC, and the clunky interface, but didn&#8217;t really mention the response times. It&#8217;s slow. Really slow. To start up the app takes what seems like an age (and is probably about a minute). To change the channel or start/stop recording also takes ages. It makes it a poor substitute for a twenty year-old VCR you might have lying around &#8212; at least if you see something appear you can get that recording quickly.</p>
<p>Pinnacle have apparently seen the light on this, and launched what they claim is a lightweight <a href="http://www.pinnaclesys.com/PublicSite/as/Products/Consumer+Products/PCTV+Tuners/PCTV+Analog+PVR+%28cable_antenna%29/Pinnacle+MediaCenter+Support/Download+Area/MediaCenter+_+TVCenter+v+4_x?mode=documents">&#8220;TV Center Pro&#8221;</a> with a lot of the fat taken out.</p>
<p>Having zapped the MediaCenter from the box and installed <a href="http://cdn.pinnaclesys.com/SupportFiles/PCTV%20Drivers/ReadmePCTV.htm">the latest drivers</a>, I can see a clear difference. It&#8217;s not superfast, but it&#8217;s an improvement. I&#8217;m still having issues with capture from analogue though. Okay so I can defrag my drive, but that&#8217;s only going to help to a certain extent. And annoyingly, capture inside Pinnacle Studio or MS Movie Maker doesn&#8217;t suffer from the same sorts of problems. There&#8217;s just something in the overhead of the TV viewer software that slows it all down.</p>
<p>I did try the open-source <a href="http://www.team-mediaportal.com/">Media Portal</a>, but couldn&#8217;t get it to work. Kept crashing. <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=2aab262d-fe33-4a4e-aaf1-fa1d3ce20d75&#038;DisplayLang=en">Windows Media Capture</a> is also worth looking at for just capturing (as an alternative to doing it from within the video editing software).</p>
<p><a href="http://arstechnica.com/guides/tweaks/vidcap.ars">ArsTechnica has an interesting article</a> that should provide some tips; they use VirtualDub VCR+Sync.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.geekrant.org/2007/07/12/pinnacle-tv-viewing-software/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pinnacle 310i TV tuner first impressions</title>
		<link>http://www.geekrant.org/2006/09/04/pinnacle-310i-tv-tuner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.geekrant.org/2006/09/04/pinnacle-310i-tv-tuner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2006 08:06:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>daniel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Input devices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekrant.org/?p=795</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I picked up a Pinnacle 310i digital/analogue TV tuner card last week. APC had listed it in its top products section, which from what I&#8217;ve seen, is usually a reasonable bet. The kids were keen to try out the video editing software (Studio QuickStart), because even though it&#8217;s a cut-down version of Pinnacle&#8217;s Studio product, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I picked up a <a href="http://www.pinnaclesys.com/PublicSite/as/Products/Consumer+Products/PCTV+Tuners/PCTV+Analog_Digital+PVR/PCTV+310i.htm">Pinnacle 310i digital/analogue TV tuner card</a> last week. <a href="http://www.apcmag.com/">APC</a> had listed it in its top products section, which from what I&#8217;ve seen, is usually a reasonable bet. The kids were keen to try out the video editing software (Studio QuickStart), because even though it&#8217;s a cut-down version of Pinnacle&#8217;s Studio product, they wanted a change from Windows Movie Maker.</p>
<p>Me? I wanted a video capture card that would work in XP. My old FlyVideo card was okay-ish under Win95 (but even then the built-in apps were a bit dodgy; the TV viewing never seemed to work properly), just about bearable under Win2K (I could do captures using the <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/windows/windowsmedia/forpros/encoder/utilities.aspx">Windows Media Capture</a> utility, but it was pretty ugly setting it up). But it doesn&#8217;t work at all under XP.</p>
<p>TV tuning was a bonus, since it would allow recording direct off telly without going via the VCR. The 310i appeared to fit the bill. Retail is A$199, but I found it for A$169 at Landmark Computers in Melbourne, and it&#8217;s probably a similar price elsewhere.</p>
<p>Installing the card appeared to be pretty straightforward. Find a spare PCI slot, bung it in, and connect the lead from the card&#8217;s Audio Out to something approximating the PC&#8217;s internal Audio In. (Okay I admit I couldn&#8217;t find anything marked Audio In, and settled for CD in instead. Given that was unoccupied, it&#8217;s got me wondering if I can normally play CDs on the box&#8230; I&#8217;m not sure I&#8217;ve ever tried.)</p>
<p>Grabbed the first of the two CDs: MediaManager, and ran the install. The first hurdle was that despite the software claiming the CD key was on the sleeve, it wasn&#8217;t, it was on the CD itself.</p>
<p>Now, I don&#8217;t splurge a lot on new IT products. Part of being a <a href="http://www.geekrant.org/2006/07/03/tech-luddite/">geek luddite</a>, I suppose. But this is the first mass-market consumer product I&#8217;ve come across that is built on the Dot Net Framework (version 1.1) and&#8230; wait for it&#8230; <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/sql/editions/express/default.mspx">SQL Server Express Edition</a>. That&#8217;s a hefty overhead for any end-user PC, and I&#8217;m glad mine has enough headroom that it doesn&#8217;t take a disk space (70Mb or so) or seemingly a performance hit, though <del datetime="2006-09-04T08:59:56+00:00">I&#8217;ll be checking if it&#8217;s now running by default</del> the service is set to start automatically. Personally I&#8217;d stick to an Access/Jet backend for any consumer-level products I was writing. It may be outdated, but it&#8217;s super-efficient in comparison.</p>
<p>Fired up the software and after a couple of false starts tuning the channels (one involving cancelling radio tuning, which took ages; one at the end where it appeared to hang, and I ended up rebooting the machine) it seemed to be playing nicely. The digital (and especially the HD) signals are brilliantly clear. Adhoc recording worked okay, too. In due course I&#8217;ll try the &#8220;burn live programmes&#8221; and timed recording functionality.</p>
<p>Mind you, I do wish software manufacturers would stop re-inventing how Windows should look. Dealing with iTunes and its permanently grey title bar is bad enough. Pinnacle&#8217;s software goes for all sorts of wacky icons for such basic tasks as minimising and maximising the window &#8212; all breaking the user&#8217;s colour and size preferences, and probably using way more PC resources than is necessary.</p>
<p>Next I ran the Studio Quickstart install. That took ages &#8212; it seemed to take an awfully long time to unpack the sample sounds in particular. When it eventually finished I had a little play with it. Pretty basic stuff. Plenty of transition and sound effects. Maybe the kids will be happy with it, but I couldn&#8217;t see any huge advantages over Windows MovieMaker (though outputting something other than WMV is definitely a plus).</p>
<p>All the best stuff (like <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bluescreen">chroma key/bluescreen</a>, which they&#8217;d love to be able to do) seems to be locked away and requires separate payment. I might eventually do the upgrade to the full version, but I really wanted the recording functionality first and foremost.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll keep playing and if I find anything worth mentioning will update later.</p>
<p><strong>2007-07-12:</strong> Followup: <a href="http://www.geekrant.org/2007/07/12/pinnacle-tv-viewing-software/">Pinnacle TV viewing software</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.geekrant.org/2006/09/04/pinnacle-310i-tv-tuner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Considering graphics tablets</title>
		<link>http://www.geekrant.org/2006/04/19/considering-graphics-tablets/</link>
		<comments>http://www.geekrant.org/2006/04/19/considering-graphics-tablets/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Apr 2006 22:04:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>daniel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Input devices]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekrant.org/?p=593</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m considering buying a graphics tablet &#8212; a Wacom or similar &#8212; to stave off any hint of mouse-related RSI. I know I use computers a lot, at work and at home, and recently I have had noticeable wrist pain on occasions. Accordingly my work mouse is now on the left, and my home mouse [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="/files/2006/wacom.jpg" width="169" height="165" alt="Wacom graphics tablet" align="right" />I&#8217;m considering buying a graphics tablet &#8212; a <a href="http://www.wacom.com.au/">Wacom</a> or similar &#8212; to stave off any hint of mouse-related RSI. I know I use computers a lot, at work and at home, and recently I have had noticeable wrist pain on occasions. Accordingly my work mouse is now on the left, and my home mouse is on the right, taking advantage of my mouse-ambidexterousnous. (Is that even a word?)</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t even know if there are any brands other than Wacom to look at. No others appear to distribute these kinds of products in Australia. (I think I recall Wacom being around in the 80s&#8230; they must be doing something right.)</p>
<p>From the looks of it, using the pen/tablet is relatively straightforward, with the only gotcha being that right clicking is marginally more difficult. Left click, double click, drag and drop, all easy. Some of the Wacom packages actually come with a mouse, but I wouldn&#8217;t see the point of this; I&#8217;d assume I&#8217;d keep my old mouse.</p>
<p>They do appear to be primarily aimed at graphics use, which is not my primary concern, though from time to time I do graphics work which would benefit from it. Wacom do have some information on <a href="http://www.wacom.com/comfort/index.cfm">tablets reducing RSI</a>. The smallest size has an A6-sized pad, which on paper provides enough accuracy to handle even big screens.</p>
<p>Two ranges, the Intuos3, which appears to be aimed at professional use, starting at AU$349 ($305 street), or the Graphire4, aimed at domestic use, starting at AU$149 ($139 street). The <a href="http://www.wacom.com.au/products/intuos_graphire.html">Intuos does have a number of extra features and better performance</a>.</p>
<p>Will go shopping at some stage and try them out, I think.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve also been told that a few minutes daily squeezing a tennis ball is a good way to help ease any mouse pain. Will try that too. A tennis ball is cheaper than a tablet (though probably less geeky fun).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.geekrant.org/2006/04/19/considering-graphics-tablets/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Browser vs Website</title>
		<link>http://www.geekrant.org/2006/02/28/browser-vs-website/</link>
		<comments>http://www.geekrant.org/2006/02/28/browser-vs-website/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2006 09:17:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>daniel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Input devices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mozilla]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web pages]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekrant.org/?p=534</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Am I the only person who uses Alt-D to get to the address bar in Firefox? I suppose I could also use Ctrl-L, or F6, but I&#8217;ve settled for Alt-D, probably because it can be easily done with one hand &#8212; my left hand &#8212; and is close to the bottom of the keyboard, making [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Am I the only person who uses Alt-D to get to the address bar in Firefox? I suppose I could also use Ctrl-L, or F6, but I&#8217;ve settled for Alt-D, probably because it can be easily done with one hand &#8212; my left hand &#8212; and is close to the bottom of the keyboard, making it easy to find.</p>
<p>Problem is some web sites implement access keys that conflict with this. The default setup for MediaWiki sites uses Alt-D as a shortcut for deleting pages! Thankfully it goes to an Are You Sure confirmation before actually doing it. They seem to have disabled it on Wikipedia, but others still have it.</p>
<p>Likewise, Horde (web mail) uses Alt-B to Blacklist mail senders, conflicting with Firefox&#8217;s Bookmarks menu.</p>
<p>Firefox doesn&#8217;t appear to have an about:config tweak for turning all such keys off, though altering accessibility.accesskeycausesactivation to False will merely put focus on the link with the access key, not &#8220;click&#8221; on it.</p>
<p><a href="http://juicystudio.com/article/access-key-companion.php">This article</a> discusses access keys in detail, including listing the requirements for access keys on UK government sites. Alt-5 for FAQ&#8230; hmmm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.geekrant.org/2006/02/28/browser-vs-website/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Disable the Insert key for good</title>
		<link>http://www.geekrant.org/2005/12/06/disable-insert-key/</link>
		<comments>http://www.geekrant.org/2005/12/06/disable-insert-key/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2005 11:45:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>daniel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Input devices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekrant.org/?p=466</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve finally got rid of the Insert key once and for all (and not just in MS-Word). Here&#8217;s how: 1. Download the Windows Resource kit. It&#8217;s the Windows Server 2003 edition, but will also work on XP. (Not supported on others, but hopefully Win2K and maybe some earlier versions?). 2. Run C:\Program Files\Windows Resource Kits\Tools\remapkey.exe [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve finally got rid of the Insert key once and for all (and <a href="http://www.geekrant.org/2005/09/30/disabling-the-insert-key/">not just in MS-Word</a>). Here&#8217;s how:</p>
<p>1. Download the <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=9D467A69-57FF-4AE7-96EE-B18C4790CFFD&#038;displaylang=en">Windows Resource kit</a>. It&#8217;s the Windows Server 2003 edition, but will also work on XP. (Not supported on others, but hopefully Win2K and maybe some earlier versions?).</p>
<p>2. Run C:\Program Files\Windows Resource Kits\Tools\remapkey.exe</p>
<p>3. On the top keyboard image, drag another key onto Insert. I made it another Shift key.</p>
<p>4. Save, reboot. Voila!</p>
<p>The catch? There had to be one, right? Shift-Insert no longer works for pasting things. You&#8217;ll have to Ctrl-V instead.</p>
<p>(Thanks to, of all things, <a href="http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2003_10/002399.php">The Washington Monthly</a>).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.geekrant.org/2005/12/06/disable-insert-key/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

