<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Geek Rant dot org &#187; Geek reference</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.geekrant.org/category/geek-reference/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.geekrant.org</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 10:44:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>iPod Touch and the &#8216;classic&#8217; geek blunder</title>
		<link>http://www.geekrant.org/2007/12/04/ipod-touch-and-the-classic-geek-blunder/</link>
		<comments>http://www.geekrant.org/2007/12/04/ipod-touch-and-the-classic-geek-blunder/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 22:38:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Phil</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Future trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geek reference]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPod]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekrant.org/2007/12/04/ipod-touch-and-the-classic-geek-blunder/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The most famous blunder of all time, according to Vizzini from the Princess Bride, is &#8220;never get involved in a land war in Asia&#8221; but the most famous blunder, I think, for a geek is not to research fully the geek tech they are going to buy. I treated myself to an 16Gb iPod Touch yesterday, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The most famous blunder of all time, according to Vizzini from the <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0093779/" title="Princess Bride at IMDB">Princess Bride</a>, is &#8220;never get involved in a land war in Asia&#8221; but the most famous blunder, I think, for a geek is not to research fully the geek tech they are going to buy.</p>
<p>I treated myself to an 16Gb iPod Touch yesterday, I&#8217;ve been meaning to get an iPod for a few years and being a user of iTunes at home for my music collection it was a logical step. The iPod Touch is a great little device, not too heavy and has a great screen but hey you already know that because &#8220;we&#8221; geeks have read all the reviews, and if lucky enough to have a nearby Apple Store we&#8217;ve had a play with one.</p>
<p>So late yesterday afternoon I took a spin down Pitt Street here in Sydney to Next Bytes (Apple Reseller) and purchased my iPod Touch, I even bought a nice silicon protector for it. I resisted the urge to open it and play with it on the trip home and ripped the packaging off once I was in front of my PC.</p>
<p><span id="more-1040"></span></p>
<p>I plugged it in to the USB socket and started iTunes only to be greated by the message:</p>
<blockquote></blockquote>
<blockquote></blockquote>
<blockquote>
<p align="left">&#8220;This iPod cannot be used because the required software is not installed. Run the iTunes installer to remove iTunes, then install the 64-bit version of iTunes.&#8221;</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Darn, I just assumed that iTunes would work with the iPod on my 64-bit Windows Vista system, yes CD Burning did not but I don&#8217;t use iTunes for that so I didn&#8217;t even think about it. The iTunes error message is intriging though it does imply that they is a 64-bit version of iTunes but searches via Google and on the Apple website have not turned up a 64-bit version of iTunes.</p>
<p>To their credit Apple do have a support article that states that iTunes is not supported on <strong>ANY </strong>64-bit version of Windows and a search of &#8220;<a href="http://www.google.com.au/search?hl=en&amp;q=itunes+%2B64-bit&amp;btnG=Google+Search&amp;meta=" title="iTunes +64-bit search results by Google">itunes +64-bit</a>&#8221; has this as the #1 result.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think Apple are naive or shortsighted to not support 64-bit Windows for iTunes and this error message gives hope that its being worked on (I&#8217;m actually wondering if 64-bit support may be related to the recent revelation that the MacOS X Leopard has hidden/in development support for Windows PE binary/executable files).</p>
<p> I&#8217;m not overjoyed that I have to use a different PC for my iPod sync&#8217;ing it is inconvenient and a real pain copying music libraries between PCs (8000 files took 5 hours last night on a gigabit network)</p>
<p>But I&#8217;ll bide my time and will be eagerly awaiting 64-bit support in a future release of iTunes and will certainly in the future be checking the compatibility of the software as well as the hardware for <strong>ANY</strong> tech I buy.</p>
<p><em> Edit @ 1235hrs: My spelling and grammer has been really bad this morning so after a review I cleaned things up, sorry about that if you were unfortunate enough to read it prior to now and wondered what I was talking about. </em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.geekrant.org/2007/12/04/ipod-touch-and-the-classic-geek-blunder/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

