Geek Rant dot org

Mon 2008-07-28

Linker problems galore

Filed under: — josh @ 16:21

LINK : fatal error LNK1104: cannot open file ‘mfcs42d.lib’

Go to Tools | Options… | Projects and Solutions | VC++ Directories, select Show Directories for: Library files and insert the path to your existing mfcs42d.lib.

Now you get
LNK2019: unresolved external symbol “public: __thiscall AFX_MODULE_STATE::AFX_MODULE_STATE(int,long (__stdcall*)(struct HWND__ *,unsigned int,unsigned int,long),unsigned long)” (??0AFX_MODULE_STATE@@QAE@HP6GJPAUHWND__@@IIJ@ZK@Z) referenced in function “public: __thiscall _AFX_DLL_MODULE_STATE::_AFX_DLL_MODULE_STATE(void)” (??0_AFX_DLL_MODULE_STATE@@QAE@XZ)

Remove mfcs42d.lib and you get
mfcs90d.lib(dllmodul.obj) : error LNK2005: _DllMain@12 already defined in MSVCRTD.lib(dllmain.obj)

Know what you did wrong?

I’ve got the answer.

Don’t link to mfcs42d (and, for that matter, the non-debug version mfcs42.lib) in your 2008 project. If that name’s hard-coded into your project – and it is, isn’t it? – then change the name to mfcs90d and you’ll be fine.

Bookmark and Share

Wed 2008-07-23

Visual C++ Compiler Error C2316: Make with the class definition

Filed under: — josh @ 12:35

Visual C++ Compiler Error C2316

You know, I was getting this error when porting some exception catching code from Visual C++ 6 to version 9. The error message helpfully states that 'exception' cannot be caught as the destructor and/or copy constructor are inaccessible

Weird thing was, it was wrong. Both the copy constructor and destructor for the class and all it’s ancestors were in public scope.

Eventually there was the figuring out: the exception was being anonymously caught, like so:
try {
whatever();
}
catch (MyExceptionClass&) {}

And to keep MSVC6 happy, earlier in the codebase a preceding programmer had coded:
class MyExceptionClass;
Which did indeed keep MSVC6 happy. MSVC9 asked what I’d done with the copy constructor. Well, dear friend: it’s in the header file that wasn’t included. Delete the forward declaration, add one #include and we are cooking with gas.

If we actually give the compiler the definition of the class being caught it can generate code rather than misleading error messages. Why the error message wasn’t: “No definition for this class” is beyond me.

Bookmark and Share

Mon 2007-01-22

Incorrect <rpcproxy.h> version. Use the header that matches with the MIDL compiler

Filed under: — josh @ 14:59

To solve this problem, check the ordering of directories searched for include files (in VC6, it’s Tools | Options | Directories | Show directories for: Include files). SDKs and Visual Studio have different versions.

Bookmark and Share

Sun 2006-09-17

Scott Meyers’ five top fives – EVER

Filed under: — josh @ 06:40

I’ve been waiting for the full set to be published, before dumping ‘em here:

Bookmark and Share

Wed 2006-07-19

What to do when attach to process doesn’t work

Filed under: — josh @ 14:00

When using Visual Studio, you can attach to a running process that’s chocked full of debug info (or not, but there’s not much point if it’s not) by selecting Build | Start Debug | Attach To Process…

This can handle cases where a problem doesn’t happen under the IDE, but does when running a debug executable. As happened to me recently. So, with the app running and the problem reproduced, I wanted to debug. But, when the dialog pops up it might be distressingly empty – as it was for me. What to do?

From task manager, right (context) click on the process and select Debug. That will launch your debugger and away you go.

Bookmark and Share

Thu 2006-02-02

When things become super freaky do a RebuildAll

Filed under: — josh @ 15:07

I just solved an irritating problem. I had a program sending heartbeats to another, but with the wrong frequency.

Putting in a breakpoint at the point where that frequency is set showed the value at 2000ms, rather than the 5000ms we had in the registry. So I checked the registry reading code was pulling the right value into the appropriate variable, and indeed it was. No other lines of code referred to the member that held this value. There was no way of setting the value other than reading from the registry in this one location. Even putting a breakpoint on change to that variable failed to show what was going on – it never broke on change – although the program did run like a dog with that breakpoint on. Much pulling of hair ensued.

Then I took the opportunity to inspect this. And I noticed, browsing through the various values, that there was a value of 2000 in the preceeding variable.

I then proceeded to use the old adage, “When things become super freaky do a RebuildAll”, and the problem was solved. Seems like there was some sort of link problem. I just wish I’d tried it earlier.

Bookmark and Share

Fri 2005-09-02

C++: Pointers to member functions

Filed under: — josh @ 08:59

Now, C++ programmers can all program C, to varying degrees of competency. And some know that in C you can store an entire function in a pointer, like so:

int DoTheThingThisWay(double count)
{
...
}

int DoTheThingThatWay(double count)
{
...
}

int (*DoTheThing)( double );  // define the variable
DoTheThing = &DoTheThingThatWay; // set the variable
result = DoTheThing( 2.0 );  // call the function, whatever it is now

Giving you a nifty kinda polymorphism. People who have programmed in C, and needed something like this (say for a state machine) have gone “neat!” and remembered it for later.

So, here we are, later. I’m working in C++ and going to do a state machine. Objects and all. I recall that you can do that polymorphic thing with function pointers, and quickly reconstruct the syntax. Now, with objects I want to point at a function on an object rather than a dumb, lying around knowing nothing about objects function. Easy, let’s just whip that up, I’ve proven how pretty the syntax for calling an arbitary function is, now just to call an arbitary member function.

Half an hour of wrestling with the compiler later, an observation is made along the lines of “everyone does this, just look it up on the web”. Top hit on a Google search for C++ “member function” pointer is http://www.goingware.com/tips/member-pointers.html – which is the right page, and you end up with the call:

result = (objectInstance.*DoTheThing)( 2.0 );

which ain’t so pretty. But you need to do that to provide the hidden this pointer, because you’re working with member functions here, not boring old functions. Add some parameters, store the pointers in an array and before you know it you’ve got

result = (objectInstance.*DoTheThing[FunctionIndex])( 2.0, InitalStringSize, HuffalumpFactor );

which is a long way from DoTheThing(2.0), and I’m not sure what you just got for all that effort. Certainly not readability. Try a pointer to a polymorphic type instead (maybe even a functiod?), and flip the pointer to different objects as you go. Much nicer:

class CThingDoer
{
public:
	virtual int operator(double count);
...
};

class CDoTheThingThisWay : public CThingDoer
{
public:
	virtual int operator(double count);
...
} DoTheThingThisWay

class CDoTheThingThatWay : public CThingDoer
{
public:
	virtual int operator(double count);
...
} DoTheThingThatWay

CThingDoer* DoTheThing;  // define the variable
DoTheThing = &DoTheThingThatWay; // set the variable
result = DoTheThing( 2.0 );  // call the function, whatever it is now

Bookmark and Share

Wed 2005-04-20

Microsoft 2005 dev tool betas

Filed under: — daniel @ 07:00

To those who watch Microsoft’s dev tools, there are betas of the 2005 versions now available. MSDN subscribers can download full products straight away; others can order CDs, or stick to the Express products, which for trying out new languages, are quite nicely featured.

It’s a cunning strategy for Microsoft, helping to counter the proliferation of free programming languages such as Java and PHP by providing free development environments for ASP, VB, C#, C++ and their own (some would say mutated) J# implementation of Java.

MSDE, which has been around for years now, providing a royalty-free cut-down SQL Server, has been renamed SQL Server Express to show its heritage. (Well, its SQL Server heritage… most people know it grew out of Sybase, but that’s ancient history). Keeping it free thus helps fight off the MySql threat and allowing people for whom Access isn’t cutting it to be encouraged up to SQL Server).

Looking back 20 years to when I was growing up, trying out BASIC on my Commodore 64 or BBC Micro, I ponder how the next generation of programmers are getting hooked into this game. I suspect a mix of freebie entry-level products like this (and their counterparts from the world of open-source) is one way they can get involved. Which probably explains MS’s “Coding 4 Fun” web site.

Bookmark and Share

27 queries. 0.522 seconds. Powered by WordPress