<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Geek Rant dot org &#187; Outlook</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.geekrant.org/category/applications/ms-office/outlook/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.geekrant.org</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 10:44:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Giant embedded slides</title>
		<link>http://www.geekrant.org/2011/09/20/giant-embedded-slides/</link>
		<comments>http://www.geekrant.org/2011/09/20/giant-embedded-slides/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2011 11:31:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>daniel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Outlook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Powerpoint]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekrant.org/?p=2070</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Email arrived. Embedded Powerpoint slides. 9Mb. Wow. Saved the slides out to a temporary directory, loaded them in Powerpoint, saved again as PPTX, edited the message (thank goodness Outlook allows this) to remove the embedded slides and attach the PPTX versions instead. Result: 663 Kb &#8212; a 93% saving in space, with no loss of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Email arrived. Embedded Powerpoint slides. 9Mb. Wow.</p>
<p>Saved the slides out to a temporary directory, loaded them in Powerpoint, saved again as PPTX, edited the message (thank goodness Outlook allows this) to remove the embedded slides and attach the PPTX versions instead. Result: 663 Kb &#8212; a 93% saving in space, with no loss of fidelity.</p>
<p>Either we need to send everybody on compulsory email attachments training, or email systems need to get much more efficient at this stuff, and clean up the stupid stuff for them automatically.</p>
<p>By the way, Outlook 2010 made it very difficult, if not impossible to save the slides. Outlook 2007 looking at the same message managed it easily. Hmmm.</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.geekrant.org/2010/06/03/outlook-bloat/">Outlook: 485 Kb of HTML = 17 Kb plain text</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.geekrant.org/2008/04/22/compress-outlook-attachments/">How to compress attachments in Outlook</a></li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.geekrant.org/2011/09/20/giant-embedded-slides/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Outlook&#8217;s HTML message bloat</title>
		<link>http://www.geekrant.org/2010/06/03/outlook-bloat/</link>
		<comments>http://www.geekrant.org/2010/06/03/outlook-bloat/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2010 07:40:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>daniel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Outlook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Email]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HTML]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plain text]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekrant.org/?p=1710</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was cleaning up my work mail, which is in Outlook using Exchange. I was staggered to see a relatively short email taking an inordinate amount of space. Copied the text including headers to a text editor. It was 6300 bytes. But Outlook claimed it was taking 485 Kb &#8212; some 76 times the amount [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was cleaning up my work mail, which is in Outlook using Exchange. I was staggered to see a relatively short email taking an inordinate amount of space.</p>
<p>Copied the text including headers to a text editor. It was 6300 bytes. But Outlook claimed it was taking 485 Kb &#8212; some 76 times the amount of text.</p>
<p>How can this be?</p>
<p>The message was in HTML format. Ah&#8230; Microsoft-generated HTML, a receipe for bloat. It seems particularly bad when the message contains a whole email trail.</p>
<p>So, using Outlook&#8217;s very handy Edit Message function (I&#8217;m surprised it&#8217;s not abused more often), I changed it to Plain Text. It&#8217;s not as if anything in there relied on the HTML in order to be legible.</p>
<p>Switcheroo, save, presto! 17 Kb. Not 6, but not 485 either. Much better.</p>
<p>Shame there isn&#8217;t an option to clean up MS HTML.</p>
<p>Another thing one can do is <a href="http://www.geekrant.org/2008/04/22/compress-outlook-attachments/">zip the attachments</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.geekrant.org/2010/06/03/outlook-bloat/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How to compress attachments in Outlook</title>
		<link>http://www.geekrant.org/2008/04/22/compress-outlook-attachments/</link>
		<comments>http://www.geekrant.org/2008/04/22/compress-outlook-attachments/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 21:57:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>daniel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Outlook]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekrant.org/2008/04/22/compress-outlook-attachments/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I use Outlook at work, and sometimes people send big attachments without zipping them up. Often they&#8217;re documents which are in the document management system anyway. Sigh. Anyway, it&#8217;s easy enough to compress them within Outlook. 1. Open mail item. 2. Save attachment(s) to a temporary directory. 3. Zip (or whatever) the file. (See? 2Mb [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use Outlook at work, and sometimes people send big attachments without zipping them up. Often they&#8217;re documents which are in the document management system anyway. Sigh.</p>
<p>Anyway, it&#8217;s easy enough to compress them within Outlook.</p>
<p>1. Open mail item.</p>
<p>2. Save attachment(s) to a temporary directory.</p>
<p>3. Zip (or whatever) the file. (See? 2Mb XLS down to 300Kb. Why didn&#8217;t the sender do that?)</p>
<p>4. In the email, click Edit / Edit Message on the menu. (This feature is a boon for fraudulent modification of emails, but also for compressing attachments.)</p>
<p>5. Right click on the attachment and Remove.</p>
<p>6. Drag the zip file into the email. (For some reason you can&#8217;t use the menu to insert an attachment like you can when composing. And the drag-drop has to land in the body section of the email.)</p>
<p>7. Save and Close the email.</p>
<p>Voila, a bunch of space saved.</p>
<p>I haven&#8217;t explored to see if the same method can be used in other mail clients.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.geekrant.org/2008/04/22/compress-outlook-attachments/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Outlook 2007 irritations</title>
		<link>http://www.geekrant.org/2007/09/17/outlook-2007-irritations/</link>
		<comments>http://www.geekrant.org/2007/09/17/outlook-2007-irritations/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Sep 2007 21:56:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>daniel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Outlook]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekrant.org/2007/09/17/outlook-2007-irritations/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why do I keep getting these? They rarely happened in Outlook 2003. I promise you, I did close Outlook properly. Just like I do every time. It&#8217;s good that this version can do the integrity check in the background, but I don&#8217;t see why it&#8217;s needed at all. IMAP performance in this version is appalling. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why do I keep getting these? They rarely happened in Outlook 2003.</p>
<p><img src="/files/2007/outlook-warning.png" width="333" height="108" alt="A data file did not close properly" /><br />
I promise you, I <strong>did</strong> close Outlook properly. Just like I do every time. It&#8217;s good that this version can do the integrity check in the background, but I don&#8217;t see why it&#8217;s needed at all.</p>
<p><img src="/files/2007/outlook-warning2.png" width="333" height="88" alt="A connection to the server cannot be established" /><br />
IMAP performance in this version is appalling. It rarely seems to stay connected to the IMAP server for more than a few seconds at a time. Just about all the time I need to keep reconnecting and/or do the Mark For Download / Process Marked Headers thing, which gets old really fast.</p>
<p>I like a lot of the other stuff in the new Outlook, but these are very irritating.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.geekrant.org/2007/09/17/outlook-2007-irritations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Outlook sigs out of sync</title>
		<link>http://www.geekrant.org/2006/08/25/outlook-signature-sync/</link>
		<comments>http://www.geekrant.org/2006/08/25/outlook-signature-sync/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Aug 2006 08:37:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>daniel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Outlook]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekrant.org/2006/08/25/outlook-signature-sync/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Using Outlook, but your signatures are going a bit funny? Turns out it keeps multiple copies of them, in RTF, HTML and TXT format, and sometimes they get out of sync. They&#8217;re in Documents and Settings\Username\Application Data\Microsoft\Signatures &#8212; if you check what&#8217;s there and delete any old ones, you should be okay after that. (Thanks [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Using Outlook, but your signatures are going a bit funny? Turns out it keeps multiple copies of them, in RTF, HTML and TXT format, and sometimes they get out of sync. They&#8217;re in <strong>Documents and Settings\Username\Application Data\Microsoft\Signatures</strong> &#8212; if you check what&#8217;s there and delete any old ones, you should be okay after that. (Thanks Dave)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.geekrant.org/2006/08/25/outlook-signature-sync/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

