<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Geek Rant dot org &#187; Applications</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.geekrant.org/category/applications/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.geekrant.org</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 10:44:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Old shapes in Visio</title>
		<link>http://www.geekrant.org/2012/01/20/old-shapes-in-visio/</link>
		<comments>http://www.geekrant.org/2012/01/20/old-shapes-in-visio/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 07:30:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>daniel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Visio]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekrant.org/?p=2111</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I know I&#8217;m using an old (2003) version of Visio, but seriously&#8230; paper tape? (I suppose these days &#8220;cards&#8221; could refer to some kind of portable storage, though I bet it really means punch cards.)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know I&#8217;m using an old (2003) version of Visio, but seriously&#8230; paper tape?</p>
<p><img src="/files/2012/visio.png" width="420" height="352" alt="Visio shapes" /></p>
<p>(I suppose these days &#8220;cards&#8221; could refer to some kind of portable storage, though I bet it really means punch cards.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.geekrant.org/2012/01/20/old-shapes-in-visio/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Giant embedded slides</title>
		<link>http://www.geekrant.org/2011/09/20/giant-embedded-slides/</link>
		<comments>http://www.geekrant.org/2011/09/20/giant-embedded-slides/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2011 11:31:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>daniel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Outlook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Powerpoint]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekrant.org/?p=2070</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Email arrived. Embedded Powerpoint slides. 9Mb. Wow. Saved the slides out to a temporary directory, loaded them in Powerpoint, saved again as PPTX, edited the message (thank goodness Outlook allows this) to remove the embedded slides and attach the PPTX versions instead. Result: 663 Kb &#8212; a 93% saving in space, with no loss of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Email arrived. Embedded Powerpoint slides. 9Mb. Wow.</p>
<p>Saved the slides out to a temporary directory, loaded them in Powerpoint, saved again as PPTX, edited the message (thank goodness Outlook allows this) to remove the embedded slides and attach the PPTX versions instead. Result: 663 Kb &#8212; a 93% saving in space, with no loss of fidelity.</p>
<p>Either we need to send everybody on compulsory email attachments training, or email systems need to get much more efficient at this stuff, and clean up the stupid stuff for them automatically.</p>
<p>By the way, Outlook 2010 made it very difficult, if not impossible to save the slides. Outlook 2007 looking at the same message managed it easily. Hmmm.</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.geekrant.org/2010/06/03/outlook-bloat/">Outlook: 485 Kb of HTML = 17 Kb plain text</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.geekrant.org/2008/04/22/compress-outlook-attachments/">How to compress attachments in Outlook</a></li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.geekrant.org/2011/09/20/giant-embedded-slides/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NoFollow not working?</title>
		<link>http://www.geekrant.org/2011/08/24/nofollow-not-working/</link>
		<comments>http://www.geekrant.org/2011/08/24/nofollow-not-working/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2011 07:56:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>daniel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CMS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google and Gmail]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekrant.org/?p=2051</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nofollow attributes were added to the web in 2005, with major search engines and blog/CMS vendors providing support. I find it interesting that it clearly hasn&#8217;t stopped comment spammers, who continue to bombard blogs. I can only assume they don&#8217;t care about Pagerank etc, but just want their links to be seen by humans, though [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=96569">Nofollow attributes</a> were added to the web in 2005, with major search engines and blog/CMS vendors providing support.</p>
<p>I find it interesting that it clearly hasn&#8217;t stopped comment spammers, who continue to bombard blogs. I can only assume they don&#8217;t care about Pagerank etc, but just want their links to be seen by humans, though I would have assumed most blog owners use spam detection of some kind, and most spam comments which do make it through are unlikely to get clicked on.</p>
<p>But that&#8217;s always been the issue with automated spam. Only a tiny number have to be acted upon to make them profitable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.geekrant.org/2011/08/24/nofollow-not-working/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Attachments</title>
		<link>http://www.geekrant.org/2011/04/25/thunderbird-attachments/</link>
		<comments>http://www.geekrant.org/2011/04/25/thunderbird-attachments/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Apr 2011 22:03:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>daniel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Applications]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekrant.org/?p=1968</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Don&#8217;t get me wrong, I like the feature of Thunderbird (and other email clients) that looks for keywords indicating you intended to attach a document, and warns you that you haven&#8217;t. But I think it needs tweaking. The attachment keyword &#8220;pdf&#8221; is clearly part of a quoted URL in this email. In these cases, I [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t get me wrong, I like the feature of Thunderbird (and other email clients) that looks for keywords indicating you intended to attach a document, and warns you that you haven&#8217;t.</p>
<p>But I think it needs tweaking.</p>
<p><img src="/files/2011/thunderbird-pdf.png" width="717" height="91" alt="Thunderbird attachment warning" border="1" /></p>
<p>The attachment keyword &#8220;pdf&#8221; is clearly part of a quoted URL in this email. In these cases, I think there&#8217;s no need to give me the warning.</p>
<p>Yeah, if I were energetic enough, I&#8217;d report the bug and/or fix it myself.</p>
<p>(Oh, whatdayaknow, I just patched to the latest version of TBird, and it looks like someone fixed it. Still, a little more quality control wouldn&#8217;t hurt to ensure this type of bug wasn&#8217;t released into a &#8220;stable&#8221; version in the first place.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.geekrant.org/2011/04/25/thunderbird-attachments/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Horde access keys</title>
		<link>http://www.geekrant.org/2011/04/04/horde-access-keys/</link>
		<comments>http://www.geekrant.org/2011/04/04/horde-access-keys/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2011 03:05:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>daniel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Applications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Email]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Horde]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web browsers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekrant.org/?p=1947</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Beware of Horde&#8217;s IMP webmail client and its access/shortcut keys. One that&#8217;s caught me is that if new email composition is set to be in a separate window, and access keys are on, then Alt-F4 (which in Windows is normally the equivalent of Close) is pressed, instead of saving the email to Drafts, or cancelling [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Beware of <a href="http://www.horde.org/">Horde&#8217;s IMP webmail client</a> and its access/shortcut keys.</p>
<p>One that&#8217;s caught me is that if new email composition is set to be in a separate window, and access keys are on, then Alt-F4 (which in Windows is normally the equivalent of Close) is pressed, instead of saving the email to Drafts, or cancelling the email, it sends it.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m a common user of Alt-F4, which means several times I&#8217;ve thought I was cancelling the email, but instead it&#8217;s sent it.</p>
<p>Another is Alt-D for Delete (the current message). On many browsers this predates Ctrl-L to go to the address window, and while I know I should learn Ctrl-L, I still commonly press Alt-D. If Horde is configured to not even put the message into the Trash, carelessly pressing Alt-D will zap the message forever more, no trace left.</p>
<p>To prevent these happening again, I&#8217;ve now turned off Access keys: Options / Global options / Display Options / Should access keys be defined for most links?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.geekrant.org/2011/04/04/horde-access-keys/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

