Comments on: Bing/Live Maps FAIL http://www.geekrant.org/2009/06/23/bing-live-maps-fail/ Fri, 27 Jan 2012 05:44:11 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Frank http://www.geekrant.org/2009/06/23/bing-live-maps-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-7946 Frank Tue, 23 Jun 2009 12:14:32 +0000 http://www.geekrant.org/?p=1316#comment-7946 Pics of my place are fairly recent (include new speed humps) but addresses are rather approximate. Pics of my place are fairly recent (include new speed humps) but addresses are rather approximate.

]]> By: daniel http://www.geekrant.org/2009/06/23/bing-live-maps-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-7945 daniel Tue, 23 Jun 2009 11:44:11 +0000 http://www.geekrant.org/?p=1316#comment-7945 It renders okay in Chrome and Firefox. The pictures I've looked at around Melbourne seem to be between 1 and 4 years old, which is not too bad really - in one case notable more recent than the images I've seen in Google Maps. It renders okay in Chrome and Firefox.

The pictures I’ve looked at around Melbourne seem to be between 1 and 4 years old, which is not too bad really – in one case notable more recent than the images I’ve seen in Google Maps.

]]> By: Chris Till http://www.geekrant.org/2009/06/23/bing-live-maps-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-7944 Chris Till Tue, 23 Jun 2009 10:02:05 +0000 http://www.geekrant.org/?p=1316#comment-7944 Wow, just took a look and boy it renders piss poor under Safari... And the "aerial" view of my area has to be OVER 10 years old as it hasn't even begun development yet, let alone roads and houses... WTF?!? What a waste of bandwidth...! Wow, just took a look and boy it renders piss poor under Safari…

And the “aerial” view of my area has to be OVER 10 years old as it hasn’t even begun development yet, let alone roads and houses… WTF?!?

What a waste of bandwidth…!

]]>