<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: I&#8217;m a tech luddite</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.geekrant.org/2006/07/03/tech-luddite/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.geekrant.org/2006/07/03/tech-luddite/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 05:44:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.geekrant.org/2006/07/03/tech-luddite/comment-page-1/#comment-5964</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Jul 2006 12:17:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekrant.org/?p=751#comment-5964</guid>
		<description>Wireless mouse and keyboard look great. No dragging of mouse wire. More space on the desk.  But are they reliable? We are on a second set and the second one is equally cantankerous as the first was.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wireless mouse and keyboard look great. No dragging of mouse wire. More space on the desk.  But are they reliable? We are on a second set and the second one is equally cantankerous as the first was.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ned lud</title>
		<link>http://www.geekrant.org/2006/07/03/tech-luddite/comment-page-1/#comment-5956</link>
		<dc:creator>ned lud</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jul 2006 01:19:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekrant.org/?p=751#comment-5956</guid>
		<description>&#039;trailing edge&#039; is the term.

a bug free, affordable, reliable technological world.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;trailing edge&#8217; is the term.</p>
<p>a bug free, affordable, reliable technological world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ren</title>
		<link>http://www.geekrant.org/2006/07/03/tech-luddite/comment-page-1/#comment-5955</link>
		<dc:creator>Ren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jul 2006 01:00:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekrant.org/?p=751#comment-5955</guid>
		<description>I must admit, the flatscreens are fun.  But I&#039;ll have your stove if you don&#039;t want it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I must admit, the flatscreens are fun.  But I&#8217;ll have your stove if you don&#8217;t want it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://www.geekrant.org/2006/07/03/tech-luddite/comment-page-1/#comment-5954</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jul 2006 23:16:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekrant.org/?p=751#comment-5954</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re bleeding edge compared to me!  

&gt;I am only just now updating my computer monitors to LCD. (Samsung 19 inch 940N, very nice, &gt;very cheap.)

I&#039;ve thought about it but not gone ahead.  Maybe when they&#039;re 
under $200. 

&gt;Iâ€™m getting my first camera phone shortly

The Nokia 3210 does me fine.

&gt;And Iâ€™m not planning on upgrading my 4:3 CRT television any time 

Just replaced the dodgy antenna socket on my nature strip
special, so that will keep mine going for a while. Although A/V
inputs would be nice. 

I could afford better stuff but there&#039;s no compelling reason
to buy.  Especially if the pace of technology advance is slowing
(the biggest TV advance was colour 30 years ago).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re bleeding edge compared to me!  </p>
<p>&gt;I am only just now updating my computer monitors to LCD. (Samsung 19 inch 940N, very nice, &gt;very cheap.)</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve thought about it but not gone ahead.  Maybe when they&#8217;re<br />
under $200. </p>
<p>&gt;Iâ€™m getting my first camera phone shortly</p>
<p>The Nokia 3210 does me fine.</p>
<p>&gt;And Iâ€™m not planning on upgrading my 4:3 CRT television any time </p>
<p>Just replaced the dodgy antenna socket on my nature strip<br />
special, so that will keep mine going for a while. Although A/V<br />
inputs would be nice. </p>
<p>I could afford better stuff but there&#8217;s no compelling reason<br />
to buy.  Especially if the pace of technology advance is slowing<br />
(the biggest TV advance was colour 30 years ago).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: josh</title>
		<link>http://www.geekrant.org/2006/07/03/tech-luddite/comment-page-1/#comment-5953</link>
		<dc:creator>josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jul 2006 07:26:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekrant.org/?p=751#comment-5953</guid>
		<description>Hey - that 5110 has gotten me work, high paying work.  I use it to illustrate that I&#039;m not fixated on new==good.

Yes, I&#039;m an extreme luddite - or perhaps I&#039;ve been burnt one thousand times too many.  I recently bought a new widescreen TV, but just a small one.  76cm.  

It&#039;s a CRT.  The new technology bites arse in the longevity stakes.  I&#039;ve been told that you can have your LCD/plasma TV replaced if 10% of the pixels are dead.  For $2,000-$10,000 a throw, the manufacturers can have a punch in the nose if 0.0001% of the pixels are dead as far as I&#039;m concerned.

50 kilos.  That&#039;s 100 pounds.  No thief is stealing this puppy.  And I didn&#039;t even get the good one, with VGA imput.  Oh well, next time.  If you can still get them next time, coz this sucker&#039;s going to last at least ten years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey &#8211; that 5110 has gotten me work, high paying work.  I use it to illustrate that I&#8217;m not fixated on new==good.</p>
<p>Yes, I&#8217;m an extreme luddite &#8211; or perhaps I&#8217;ve been burnt one thousand times too many.  I recently bought a new widescreen TV, but just a small one.  76cm.  </p>
<p>It&#8217;s a CRT.  The new technology bites arse in the longevity stakes.  I&#8217;ve been told that you can have your LCD/plasma TV replaced if 10% of the pixels are dead.  For $2,000-$10,000 a throw, the manufacturers can have a punch in the nose if 0.0001% of the pixels are dead as far as I&#8217;m concerned.</p>
<p>50 kilos.  That&#8217;s 100 pounds.  No thief is stealing this puppy.  And I didn&#8217;t even get the good one, with VGA imput.  Oh well, next time.  If you can still get them next time, coz this sucker&#8217;s going to last at least ten years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

