A Question on Outsourcing
I think I’m a little stupid.
Given:
- Outsourcing is basically an attempt to cut costs by moving work to a lower-wage environment
- Management is paid more than the IT staff
What is the logical conclusion?

I think I’m a little stupid.
Given:
What is the logical conclusion?
| M | T | W | T | F | S | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| « Mar | May » | |||||
| 1 | 2 | |||||
| 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 |
| 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 |
| 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 |
| 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 |
26 queries. 0.331 seconds. Powered by WordPress
April 29th, 2006 at 07:30
A couple of important points to my overall point:
- People generally act according to self-interest.
- Management of a company are the only people who have the power to make strategic decisions.
- All the people in a manager’s MonkeySphere are other managers.
Given all of those points, a manager is only ever going to fire a) other people and b) people they don’t know and therefore don’t care about. So that’s going to lead to the grunts.
I mean, have you ever heard of a board of directors voting to give themselves a pay cut? The parliamentarians voting to reduce their benefits? There is simply no incentive for them to reduce their salaries/benefits.
April 30th, 2006 at 11:54
Your point 1 is not necessarily true. In many cases, outsourcing is an attempt to reduce the total number of fulltime employees, not to save money.
April 30th, 2006 at 19:13
Wouldn’t an outsourced environment:
1. Reduce the amount of liabilities (eg long-service leave, redundancy
payouts, etc),
2. Reduce the amount of fixed costs (full-time wages) and increase
the amount of variable costs?
Liabilities & fixed costs are evil while variable costs are good,
since the latter are easier to alter, giving managers more ‘flexibility’.
Peter