<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bloglines no like</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.geekrant.org/2006/01/10/bloglines-rss-errors/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.geekrant.org/2006/01/10/bloglines-rss-errors/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 05:44:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: daniel</title>
		<link>http://www.geekrant.org/2006/01/10/bloglines-rss-errors/comment-page-1/#comment-5602</link>
		<dc:creator>daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2006 01:42:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekrant.org/?p=488#comment-5602</guid>
		<description>With many thanks to Paul from Bloglines, who spotted this blog post, this has been resolved.

The error message above wasn&#039;t very clear; in fact the Bloglines crawlers were getting a 403 Forbidden error. This is my fault, because a while ago I set up .htaccess to block a number of IP ranges because comment spammers and the like were &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.geekrant.org/2005/07/14/spammers-bandwidth-thieves/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;stealing heaps of bandwidth&lt;/a&gt;. Evidently when Bloglines recently moved their servers, they got IP addresses in this range.

Mea culpa. My stuff-up.

Paul says they are working on making errors clearer. Thanks again Paul.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With many thanks to Paul from Bloglines, who spotted this blog post, this has been resolved.</p>
<p>The error message above wasn&#8217;t very clear; in fact the Bloglines crawlers were getting a 403 Forbidden error. This is my fault, because a while ago I set up .htaccess to block a number of IP ranges because comment spammers and the like were <a href="http://www.geekrant.org/2005/07/14/spammers-bandwidth-thieves/" rel="nofollow">stealing heaps of bandwidth</a>. Evidently when Bloglines recently moved their servers, they got IP addresses in this range.</p>
<p>Mea culpa. My stuff-up.</p>
<p>Paul says they are working on making errors clearer. Thanks again Paul.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: daniel</title>
		<link>http://www.geekrant.org/2006/01/10/bloglines-rss-errors/comment-page-1/#comment-5582</link>
		<dc:creator>daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2006 11:41:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekrant.org/?p=488#comment-5582</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I do plan upgrading to Wordpress 2 at some stage. But I&#039;m not doing it just because

- one aggregator fails (when all the others work) and I haven&#039;t changed anything to cause it

- their support people haven&#039;t got back to me to clarify the error, which is clearly incorrect (the feed exists. If the feed is invalid, by all means say so, don&#039;t claim it doesn&#039;t exist though)

- there&#039;s no guarantee WP2 will solve it

The other issue is I don&#039;t have a lot of spare time, and won&#039;t go to WP2.0 until I&#039;m confident it&#039;s very stable and I don&#039;t have to muck about with it a lot to keep it running. (Which by my usual rules means waiting for a couple of bugfix releases to go by before jumping in!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I do plan upgrading to WordPress 2 at some stage. But I&#8217;m not doing it just because</p>
<p>- one aggregator fails (when all the others work) and I haven&#8217;t changed anything to cause it</p>
<p>- their support people haven&#8217;t got back to me to clarify the error, which is clearly incorrect (the feed exists. If the feed is invalid, by all means say so, don&#8217;t claim it doesn&#8217;t exist though)</p>
<p>- there&#8217;s no guarantee WP2 will solve it</p>
<p>The other issue is I don&#8217;t have a lot of spare time, and won&#8217;t go to WP2.0 until I&#8217;m confident it&#8217;s very stable and I don&#8217;t have to muck about with it a lot to keep it running. (Which by my usual rules means waiting for a couple of bugfix releases to go by before jumping in!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Titel</title>
		<link>http://www.geekrant.org/2006/01/10/bloglines-rss-errors/comment-page-1/#comment-5576</link>
		<dc:creator>Titel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2006 15:56:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekrant.org/?p=488#comment-5576</guid>
		<description>Before anything else, upgrade to WordPress 2 and check the permalinks.

For some reason, FeedValidator.org says &quot;Temporary failure in name resolution&quot; after pausing for almost a minute. Perhaps there are problems with the webhost&#039;s DNS servers?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Before anything else, upgrade to WordPress 2 and check the permalinks.</p>
<p>For some reason, FeedValidator.org says &#8220;Temporary failure in name resolution&#8221; after pausing for almost a minute. Perhaps there are problems with the webhost&#8217;s DNS servers?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

