<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MS Word footers are buggy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.geekrant.org/2005/12/23/ms-word-footers-are-buggy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.geekrant.org/2005/12/23/ms-word-footers-are-buggy/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 05:44:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Snowed</title>
		<link>http://www.geekrant.org/2005/12/23/ms-word-footers-are-buggy/comment-page-1/#comment-6547</link>
		<dc:creator>Snowed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 04:16:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekrant.org/?p=478#comment-6547</guid>
		<description>I hate Word. Have spent an hour trying to create two sections, numbering only the second section. Where is the f***ing header &quot;toolbar&quot; ? I pick centered page numbering and it won&#039;t center. And Word quits on me constantly. I hate it. Did I mention I hate it? When I have a choice, I use anything else - Mellel, TextEdit, fingerpainting. Then paste into Word for people who insist on receiving Word docs. Word turns writing into meta-writing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hate Word. Have spent an hour trying to create two sections, numbering only the second section. Where is the f***ing header &#8220;toolbar&#8221; ? I pick centered page numbering and it won&#8217;t center. And Word quits on me constantly. I hate it. Did I mention I hate it? When I have a choice, I use anything else &#8211; Mellel, TextEdit, fingerpainting. Then paste into Word for people who insist on receiving Word docs. Word turns writing into meta-writing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: daniel</title>
		<link>http://www.geekrant.org/2005/12/23/ms-word-footers-are-buggy/comment-page-1/#comment-6030</link>
		<dc:creator>daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Aug 2006 13:41:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekrant.org/?p=478#comment-6030</guid>
		<description>Just an update -- I&#039;ve had another instance of this, where using the menus didn&#039;t help either. It was definitely linked to their being sections with varying numbers of columns. In some cases the footers appeared attached to individual sections.

I ended up copying blocks of text onto new copies of the page, while checking the footers for the correct date, as I went.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just an update &#8212; I&#8217;ve had another instance of this, where using the menus didn&#8217;t help either. It was definitely linked to their being sections with varying numbers of columns. In some cases the footers appeared attached to individual sections.</p>
<p>I ended up copying blocks of text onto new copies of the page, while checking the footers for the correct date, as I went.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy</title>
		<link>http://www.geekrant.org/2005/12/23/ms-word-footers-are-buggy/comment-page-1/#comment-5526</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2005 06:52:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekrant.org/?p=478#comment-5526</guid>
		<description>Well yeah if it works the way you&#039;re doing it.  Though my impression is that word can be a bit fiddly for positioning things.

But in the end license fees kill, particularly when it&#039;s something you&#039;re doing voluntarily.  Though InDesign and Quark are both fairly intuitive and still it&#039;d take a bit of effort to lay the whole thing out again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well yeah if it works the way you&#8217;re doing it.  Though my impression is that word can be a bit fiddly for positioning things.</p>
<p>But in the end license fees kill, particularly when it&#8217;s something you&#8217;re doing voluntarily.  Though InDesign and Quark are both fairly intuitive and still it&#8217;d take a bit of effort to lay the whole thing out again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: daniel</title>
		<link>http://www.geekrant.org/2005/12/23/ms-word-footers-are-buggy/comment-page-1/#comment-5525</link>
		<dc:creator>daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Dec 2005 11:20:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekrant.org/?p=478#comment-5525</guid>
		<description>Ideal? Probably not. But would it be worth my while to find, buy and learn another tool, such as Pagemaker, Quark or Publisher to do it on? Somehow I doubt it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ideal? Probably not. But would it be worth my while to find, buy and learn another tool, such as Pagemaker, Quark or Publisher to do it on? Somehow I doubt it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy</title>
		<link>http://www.geekrant.org/2005/12/23/ms-word-footers-are-buggy/comment-page-1/#comment-5523</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Dec 2005 09:05:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekrant.org/?p=478#comment-5523</guid>
		<description>Not entirely related because this isn&#039;t a layout bug though don&#039;t know how you can manage with Word for this kind of thing! ;)

All software has its bugs but I can&#039;t imagine that a word processor such as MS Word would be ideal for page layout.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not entirely related because this isn&#8217;t a layout bug though don&#8217;t know how you can manage with Word for this kind of thing! <img src='http://www.geekrant.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>All software has its bugs but I can&#8217;t imagine that a word processor such as MS Word would be ideal for page layout.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

