<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Digital SLR: Initial thoughts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.geekrant.org/2005/05/05/digital-slr-initial-thoughts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.geekrant.org/2005/05/05/digital-slr-initial-thoughts/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 05:44:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: josh</title>
		<link>http://www.geekrant.org/2005/05/05/digital-slr-initial-thoughts/comment-page-1/#comment-5716</link>
		<dc:creator>josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Mar 2006 05:35:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekrant.org/2005/05/05/digital-slr-initial-thoughts/#comment-5716</guid>
		<description>The camera rotates pictures automatically when they&#039;re downloaded to the computer, but it doesn&#039;t rotate them on the Compact Flash card - so a CF card reader is going to load them onto the computer, rotated.  I&#039;d prefer not to fix this problem myself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The camera rotates pictures automatically when they&#8217;re downloaded to the computer, but it doesn&#8217;t rotate them on the Compact Flash card &#8211; so a CF card reader is going to load them onto the computer, rotated.  I&#8217;d prefer not to fix this problem myself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: josh</title>
		<link>http://www.geekrant.org/2005/05/05/digital-slr-initial-thoughts/comment-page-1/#comment-3669</link>
		<dc:creator>josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2005 07:11:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekrant.org/2005/05/05/digital-slr-initial-thoughts/#comment-3669</guid>
		<description>The $19 CF card reader is a &#039;real soon now&#039; purchase, and like I said, I can actually live with the slow transfer speeds (right now, tolerance will no doubt drop over time).  But really, devices that &lt;em&gt;can&lt;/em&gt; look and act like others, &lt;em&gt;should&lt;/em&gt;.  Stupid XP.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The $19 CF card reader is a &#8216;real soon now&#8217; purchase, and like I said, I can actually live with the slow transfer speeds (right now, tolerance will no doubt drop over time).  But really, devices that <em>can</em> look and act like others, <em>should</em>.  Stupid XP.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Philip</title>
		<link>http://www.geekrant.org/2005/05/05/digital-slr-initial-thoughts/comment-page-1/#comment-3664</link>
		<dc:creator>Philip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 May 2005 23:50:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekrant.org/2005/05/05/digital-slr-initial-thoughts/#comment-3664</guid>
		<description>Why not just get a $19 CF card reader so you don&#039;t have to have a cable between the camera and computer?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why not just get a $19 CF card reader so you don&#8217;t have to have a cable between the camera and computer?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ren</title>
		<link>http://www.geekrant.org/2005/05/05/digital-slr-initial-thoughts/comment-page-1/#comment-3648</link>
		<dc:creator>Ren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 May 2005 09:31:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekrant.org/2005/05/05/digital-slr-initial-thoughts/#comment-3648</guid>
		<description>Oh gawd... you bought the Canon. I couldn&#039;t afford the Canon, so I got the Pentax *istDS.  But I WANTED the Canon. *siiiiigh*  And yeah, XP sucks for pulling things off the camera.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh gawd&#8230; you bought the Canon. I couldn&#8217;t afford the Canon, so I got the Pentax *istDS.  But I WANTED the Canon. *siiiiigh*  And yeah, XP sucks for pulling things off the camera.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andy</title>
		<link>http://www.geekrant.org/2005/05/05/digital-slr-initial-thoughts/comment-page-1/#comment-3628</link>
		<dc:creator>andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2005 12:57:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekrant.org/2005/05/05/digital-slr-initial-thoughts/#comment-3628</guid>
		<description>Warning: Mac-Zealot mode: OS X &amp; GraphicConverter.

Sorry. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Warning: Mac-Zealot mode: OS X &amp; GraphicConverter.</p>
<p>Sorry. <img src='http://www.geekrant.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

