Comments on: Gatesy-baby! Argh! My eyes! http://www.geekrant.org/2005/01/20/gatesy-baby/ Fri, 27 Jan 2012 05:44:11 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Paul Wakeford http://www.geekrant.org/2005/01/20/gatesy-baby/comment-page-1/#comment-483 Paul Wakeford Thu, 20 Jan 2005 23:23:51 +0000 http://www.geekrant.org/2005/01/20/gatesy-baby/#comment-483 1985. http://www.snopes.com/photos/people/gates.asp Paul 1985.

http://www.snopes.com/photos/people/gates.asp

Paul

]]> By: Ren http://www.geekrant.org/2005/01/20/gatesy-baby/comment-page-1/#comment-467 Ren Thu, 20 Jan 2005 01:11:07 +0000 http://www.geekrant.org/2005/01/20/gatesy-baby/#comment-467 Sexeh! (Um. Not.) Sexeh! (Um. Not.)

]]> By: Josh http://www.geekrant.org/2005/01/20/gatesy-baby/comment-page-1/#comment-466 Josh Thu, 20 Jan 2005 00:17:08 +0000 http://www.geekrant.org/2005/01/20/gatesy-baby/#comment-466 Wouldn't MS have had pre-production machines? Wouldn’t MS have had pre-production machines?

]]>