<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl" type="text/xsl" media="screen"?><?xml-stylesheet href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css" type="text/css" media="screen"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" --><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">

<channel>
	<title>Geek Rant dot org</title>
	<link>http://www.geekrant.org</link>
	<description />
	<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 10:45:11 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/geekrant" type="application/rss+xml" /><item>
		<title>Google now offers OpenID</title>
		<link>http://www.geekrant.org/2009/01/04/google-openid/</link>
		<comments>http://www.geekrant.org/2009/01/04/google-openid/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 10:43:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>daniel</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Google and Gmail]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekrant.org/2009/01/04/google-openid/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Your Google account is now an OpenID, apparently&#8230; Jeff Atwood at Stackoverflow knows what he&#8217;s talking about, and reckons you just enter google.com/accounts/o8/id when asked, and it&#8217;ll throw you to a Google logon screen.
Neato.
(Ah, I must have missed it when it was announced: Google and Microsoft both jumped on the OpenID bandwagon in October.)
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your Google account is now an OpenID, apparently&#8230; Jeff Atwood at Stackoverflow knows what he&#8217;s talking about, <a href="http://blog.stackoverflow.com/2009/01/we-now-support-multiple-openids/">and reckons</a> you just enter google.com/accounts/o8/id when asked, and it&#8217;ll throw you to a Google logon screen.</p>
<p>Neato.</p>
<p>(Ah, I must have missed it when it was announced: <a href="http://openid.net/2008/10/30/microsoft-and-google-announce-openid-support/">Google and Microsoft both jumped</a> on the OpenID bandwagon in October.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.geekrant.org/2009/01/04/google-openid/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hold music down (severity level unknown)</title>
		<link>http://www.geekrant.org/2008/12/29/hold-music/</link>
		<comments>http://www.geekrant.org/2008/12/29/hold-music/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 03:22:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>daniel</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[ISPs]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Outages]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekrant.org/2008/12/29/hold-music/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I find it mildly amusing when the web hosting ISP reports through its system status RSS feed that the support phone line hold music has broken down.
But I suppose it shows they&#8217;re serious about tech support issues.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find it mildly amusing when the web hosting ISP reports through its system status RSS feed that <a href="http://status.aussiehq.com.au/item/2365.html" title="Upon further investigation, the device providing music to the telephone system has failed.">the support phone line hold music has broken down</a>.</p>
<p>But I suppose it shows they&#8217;re serious about tech support issues.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.geekrant.org/2008/12/29/hold-music/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Shut up, damn ads</title>
		<link>http://www.geekrant.org/2008/12/28/shut-up-damn-ads/</link>
		<comments>http://www.geekrant.org/2008/12/28/shut-up-damn-ads/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Dec 2008 12:17:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>daniel</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Advertising]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekrant.org/2008/12/28/shut-up-damn-ads/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Usually adverts on web pages don&#8217;t irritate me. I know some people hate them, and use blockers to prevent them, but they don&#8217;t bug me.
Except those stupid, moronic, noisy smiley adverts which some GIT has decided should use sound without asking you first. IDIOTS!
It&#8217;s especially galling when you&#8217;re trying to watch (and listen) to a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Usually adverts on web pages don&#8217;t irritate me. I know some people hate them, and use blockers to prevent them, but they don&#8217;t bug me.</p>
<p>Except those stupid, moronic, noisy smiley adverts which some GIT has decided should use sound without asking you first. IDIOTS!</p>
<p>It&#8217;s especially galling when you&#8217;re <a href="http://videos.streetfire.net/video/Top-gear-Basel-To_201551.htm">trying to watch (and listen) to a video</a>, so you can&#8217;t even switch to mute.</p>
<p>To kill them (and I have), edit the &#8220;hosts&#8221; file. On Windows this is at <strong>C:\windows\system32\drivers\etc\hosts</strong> or thereabouts. Note the file has no file extension. On a Mac, <a href="http://support.apple.com/kb/TA27291?viewlocale=en_US">this Apple support article explains how to get at it</a>.</p>
<p>Put the ad servers you want to block in there, against the loopback IP address of 127.0.0.1. In Firefox you can find them by going to Tools / Page Info / Media and look for the embedded SWF files that match the irritating ads. Use a tab character between the IP address and the server name.</p>
<p>127.0.0.1 ad.doubleclick.net<br />
127.0.0.1 ad.yieldmanager.net<br />
127.0.0.1 ad.doubleclick.com<br />
127.0.0.1 content.yieldmanager.edgesuite.net<br />
127.0.0.1 b.casalemedia.com</p>
<p>Done. Stupid moronic noisy smiley ads gone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.geekrant.org/2008/12/28/shut-up-damn-ads/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Setting your privacy on Facebook</title>
		<link>http://www.geekrant.org/2008/12/21/fb-privacy-friends/</link>
		<comments>http://www.geekrant.org/2008/12/21/fb-privacy-friends/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Dec 2008 11:41:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>daniel</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Social networking]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekrant.org/2008/12/21/fb-privacy-friends/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Facebook don&#8217;t really explain how to restrict some of your information to particular friends, but it&#8217;s not hard to do with the new privacy settings.
1. First go to Friends, and if it doesn&#8217;t already exist, make a Friends List called Limited Profile. This will be used to limit what some people can see. (You can [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Facebook don&#8217;t really explain how to restrict some of your information to particular friends, but it&#8217;s not hard to do with the new privacy settings.</p>
<p>1. First go to Friends, and if it doesn&#8217;t already exist, make a Friends List called Limited Profile. This will be used to limit what some people can see. (You can use multiple lists to have different permissions.)</p>
<p>2. Put the appropriate people into it. (When confirming friends it gives you that option, too).</p>
<p>3. Then go into your Settings / Privacy Settings / Profile. You can customise who you want to see what, and exclude the Limited Profile people from seeing particular information &#8212; or have particular people see/not see whatever you want.</p>
<p>Easy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.geekrant.org/2008/12/21/fb-privacy-friends/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The ultimate C64 talk</title>
		<link>http://www.geekrant.org/2008/12/18/the-ultimate-c64-talk/</link>
		<comments>http://www.geekrant.org/2008/12/18/the-ultimate-c64-talk/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 06:50:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>daniel</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Nostalgia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekrant.org/2008/12/18/the-ultimate-c64-talk/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Never mind the present day troubles with IE, how about some good ol&#8217; fashioned nostalgia?
For those remember coding on the Commodore 64 (rather than just using it), check this terrific essay from pagetable.com &#8212; to go with a forthcoming talk on the subject.
It took me back to bits of knowledge about 6502/6510 and the VIC [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Never mind the present day troubles with IE, how about some good ol&#8217; fashioned nostalgia?</p>
<p>For those remember coding on the Commodore 64 (rather than just using it), <a href="http://www.pagetable.com/?p=53">check this terrific essay from pagetable.com</a> &#8212; to go with a <a href="http://events.ccc.de/congress/2008/Fahrplan/events/2874.en.html">forthcoming talk on the subject</a>.</p>
<p>It took me back to bits of knowledge about 6502/6510 and the VIC II chip that I thought I&#8217;d forgotten, and I&#8217;ll certainly be watching out for the slides.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.geekrant.org/2008/12/18/the-ultimate-c64-talk/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
